I advocate Pacifism. Violence over the poltics is not something I want.

Hi everyone. I really have noticed that there are people online and offline that are less able to control anger and end up hurting people. I am trying to never never never do that. Political extremism and political violence based on anything other than the "Whole Truth" is never justified. Recently, I became aware that there is a movement in the world called "identitarianism" that is characterized by "Xenophobia" and outrage "from outside or beyond" against "others" or "outside agitators" that is unhelpful and defeats the purposes of honest politics. I am more recently aware of feminist xenophobic right-wing people in France are becoming more xenophobic and hostile and are becoming more identitarian and "pro-Europe" and more "anti-immigration" and are "anti-outsider" from a far-right and hostility and rage-centered perspective. These anti-immigration activists are becoming hostile to basic human rights among Pro-democracy and pro-socialism activists among PALESTINIANS! There is the fear that they try to instill, that palestinians will take away all human rights and destroy civilization and bleh bleh bleh, and it is insignificant and incorrect because the xenophobic feminists cannot distinguish between socialist and social democratic Arabs and regular muslims and far-right muslims. The concept of the political spectrum and far-right authoritarianism politics is foreign to these people! These xenophobic people are just trying to claim power for themselves. They are using the false scapegoating of immigrants to the same tactics that truly evil people use to re-compensate us for their limitations and failures. The concepts that are present in these neighborhoods are drifting many people astray. Many pro-feminist groups in places like France and Europe are being led to support far-right identitarians because of the negativity and the unproductive failures of standard right-wing and standard left-wing politicians to deliver results. Now the new standards is emphasizing the negativity and the falsehoods that are not distinguished from lies in the world. It is the same with Hitler, it is the same with Stalin. Someone always has to blame someone else. Here is what I want to do, propose a few simple positive solutions to pushing back that do not result in violence. 1. Avoid violence and confrontation (for all time) 2. Push back in a reasonable manner like having conversations, writing or journaling and publishing. Share it only with friends who you do trust. Practice non-violent mental health intervention for friends you think need it mentally, but only in extreme cases where you think you need to step in to prevent someone from getting hurt. 3. Practice nonviolence. Always focus on the positives, and dwell only on them, and dwell less on the negatives. 4. See the good in people frankly and honestly, and try to look only for what is good in people, and pass over and learn to forgive that which is more negative in people. 5. If you get into a fight with someone, after it begins and after which you feel it cannot be resolved peacefully, and that that person starting the fight is an active threat, call the police, but only in facts of situational proven violence and violation of proven constitutional rights! That is what I am trying to promote. I am not promoting violence. The best means of preventing more violence is the reasonable use of the courts to resolve legal remedies against neighbors in the most extreme cases and other cases of confrontation and violence, used to prevent escalation under constitutionally codified and prescribed legal means. When you have a democracy, people need to stand against violence and resolve differences non-violently and only in extreme cases use the judicial courts, and if there are practical lower judicial courts, or other practices that prevent violence from escalating, use all available democratic and non-violent methods to resolve differences. That is the best practical answer that I can really imagine, and I hope it could be sufficient for other people. Now, a little story: Someone got killed over the protests involving the "Feminist Xenophobes" in France on 14 February 2026. At a protest in favor of Palestine, A counter-prostesters' demostration emerged against the speaker Rima Hassan, a French La France Insoumise Member of European Parliament who spoke at IEP Lyon University in Lyon, France. A protest, led by the protest movement called ""Collectif Nmsis"" an identitarian and feminist far-right movement in France, a much smaller political movement in france, emerged against Rima Hassan. Miss Rima Hassan is a non-violent peaceful demonstrator, who has been a peaceful activist for refugees and for the homeless in France, and is a peaceful non-violent activist for Palestinian Solidarity and peacefully calling for changes in governmental foreign affairs policies regarding Israel. These anti-muslim anti-immigrant and xenophobic right-wing feminists in the so-called "Collectif Nmsis" groups denouced her policies by protesting, in a rather confrontational an threatening banner on the campus of IEP Lyon University in Lyon that said ""Islamo-leftists, out of our universities."" That banner said those words that are implicitly xenophobic against all muslims, implying that no muslim is non-extreme and that they are leftists. Very intolerant and rude and shameful and xenophobic. And completely founded only on lies and xenophobic false ideas. According to Le Progrs, citing a source close to the investigation, two small groups of at least twenty people met a few hundred meters behind the political science school, behind the railway line. After these clashes, a man named Quentin Deranque and another person left the area for good, but as Quentin was returning home, Quentin was isolated, beaten, then knocked to the ground, lynched, and left for dead, according to the mother of a friend. The scene was filmed by a witness, and the video was circulated in the press. On 14 February, TF1 broadcast a video of the events showing about fifteen men beating three individuals. Quentin Deranque, a Natonalist, was supporting the far-right group Collectif Nmsis, and was using the far-right xenophobic platform to protest Miss Rima Hassan. Quentin Deranque was mad at the university for hosting Rima Hassan, so he appeared with the xenophobic Collectif Nmsis group to protest. Everyone has a right to protest, but it was slightly within the edge of what is legal. I think this action the far-right group did is borderline intimidation and is for the ultimate wrong reasons for doing so that the so-called Collectif Nmsis group decided to raise that intimidating racist banner. The fact that the event provoked the Lyon city fire department to be involved before the event began in the first place with the raising of the banner and resulted in the fights breaking out is the true problem that Collectif Nmsis started by unfurling a very intimidating racist and inflammatory banner. It just is so bad that the protest began in the first place! The protest that escalated was started as a counter-protest started by xenophobic Collectif Nmsis far-rightists against officially sanctioned and organized campus political protests by a legitimate figure against the policies of the French Government, Rima Hassan, and the original campus event hosted by the University and La France Insoumise and the politician Rima Hassan was part of a broader academic trend of legitimate protests against the French Government's policies surrounding the French Government's official ties to the Government of Israel in aiding the military of the Israeli government. The original movements in prostest against Israel are legitimate, because the government of Israel has been committing a genocide against Gaza and Palestinians and has sparked outrage among many people all over the world! It is the reactionary racism against palestinians and racism that is leading to this world backlash against decent…