Why do the Admin keep discriminating against me by removing my photo, when is specifically COMPLIES with their "Photo Upload Rules"? - I've even overlaid the photo with text making that point and uploaded it like that too, to see if they get the message, but of course not. This is pure discrimination. There must be 10's of 1000's of similar photos on here (nude, showing partial face) - so why am I being DISCRIMINATED against? Any ideas?
Replies
- JAJamesOriginal PosterOct 27, 2020
...and it's happened yet again
ReactReply - JO
JohnOct 27, 2020I told you this once before, but here it is again. I don't believe anyone is deleting your photo(s). It's just a bug in the upload process that does not allow the process to completely finish. I have had photos disappear. I just upload it again. If you notice, your profile photo is still there. It could be anything causing it. Size of the photo, the format it's in, the OS your uploading from, who knows. This site is more of a hobby than a business for the owners. Some things get fixed quickly, some slowly, some never at all. It is not necessary to have your photos on this site to enjoy it. Just move on.
John aka cobeachbum
ReactReply - JOJohnOct 27, 2020
Since I can't access your media page, I can only take a guess based on your profile photo, but if your face is not completely visable, the rules say no genitals either. It is possible the photo complies with this, but as I said, I can't see the whole photo, just what is framed in your profile.
John aka cobeachbum
ReactReply - JAJamesOriginal PosterOct 27, 2020[quote]Since I can't access your media page, I can only take a guess based on your profile photo, but if your face is not completely visable, the rules say no genitals either. It is possible the photo complies with this, but as I said, I can't see the whole photo, just what is framed in your profile.John aka cobeachbum[/quote]
Thanks John for taking the time to reply.
To copy/paste the upload rules:
"Media Upload Rules
No headless shots allowed [strong]if genitals are shown, PARTIAL FACE must at least be shown[/strong]
Pictures must be nudist-friendly. No voyeuristic, exhibitionist photos
No sexual pictures, erections, crotch shots or pornographic pictures are not allowed
No Spread Eagle, or shots where the butt, genitals or anus are the main focus point.
No photos containing anyone under the age of 18. Even clothed photos
All pictures can be deleted at the discretion of the administrator
Please rotate, crop or adjust all photos, prior to upload. Improperly uploaded photos will be removed"
Well, you can just about see half my penis if you really bother to look... and my face is partially shown. [strong]EXACTLY as per rule 1.[/strong]
Maybe you're right - perhaps it is some weird upload bug... but I don't think so, the photo shows correctly for several hours, blows up when clicked in my gallery and so on, then it disappears. This has happened with the plain photo, and the one with the text overlay, which is obviously a different fiile. I have emailed admin, but just like virtually everyone else who ever tries, have had no response.
Just uploaded photo again 10 times... see how long they take to disappear, of if I get totally banned from the site(!) - if that doesn't work then I'll try resampling the photo into a totally new file with different pixel count, and see what happens.ReactReply - JOJohnOct 28, 2020
The "partial face" is new in the rules. It used to just say face.
John aka cobeachbum
ReactReply - CY
CoR YYCOct 28, 2020Try showing more face. This may be an unpalatable option if you don't want to be identifiable in your profile pic. Alternatively you could use a shot that does not display your genitals, in which case a face is not required at all.
ReactReply - JAJamesOriginal PosterOct 28, 2020[quote]Try showing more face. This may be an unpalatable option if you don't want to be identifiable in your profile pic. Alternatively you could use a shot that does not display your genitals, in which case a face is not required at all.[/quote] Thousands of photos on here of male and female genitals without ANY face shown at all! - that's what I don't get. My new pic was carefully cropped just to show I was naked, without being too graphic. My previous profile pic that I've had for couple of years had NO face and FULL genitals, to get technical about it. So it actually broke the rules in theory?!. How is my new pic, which DOES COMPLY with the rules, a bad thing? That is what I'm trying to understand. Do they want MORE COCK??! Is that the problem?ReactReply
- JAJamesOriginal PosterOct 28, 2020Oh, and I don't know about you, but when I go to search page, the profile at the top is always pipearl4christ spreadeagled with her vagina hanging out - specifically breaking the rules... But I guess she makes thousands for the site from men signing up to membership fees to see her other 2000+ flange photos, so that's OK, right?
Let's face it, this site is now nothing more than a poor excuse for a porn site, which is a shame because the original idea of it is quite a good one.ReactReply - JOJohnOct 28, 2020
The rules (and the enformement of those rules) has changed over the 11ish years. Older photos tended to get away with things that aren't allowed now, but stay unless enough people flag them.
TT2 has also claimed recently that every uploaded photo is seen by a moderator (TT1, TT2, TT3, and I think there is a TT4 now too). I don't believe this though. It used to be a photo uploaded by a you would appear in your gallery as "pending" or some similar verbage until it was approved, and could not be seen by anyone else. ( I do believe it was visible in the feed) That no longer happens. Media uploaded now is immediately viewable by anyone who otherwise has access to it. It is possible you have someone immediately flagging your photos, and TT2 is not taking the time to actually view them, just deleting them, especially since the allegedly offensive photo remains as your profile photo (For which the flag option has been broken for a long time (as has the main gallery flag).
John aka cobeachbum
ReactReply - MA
ManOfWicklowOct 28, 2020No promoting products or services. Your latest pic is promoting Walls ice cream. Try loading a normal photo instead of all the silly pics you keep complaining about.
ReactReply - JOJohnOct 28, 2020[quote]Oh, and I don't know about you, but when I go to search page, the profile at the top is always pipearl4christ spreadeagled with her vagina hanging out [/quote] I've complained about pipearl4christ, even sending a direct message to TT2 with a link to one of her spread eagle shots. She seemed "shocked" that such a photo existed. It disappeared for a few days, and was then uploaded again. pipearl4christ then blocked me. How did she know I complained? TT2 never answered that question. John aka cobeachbumReactReply
- NU
NudeKayakerOct 28, 2020I know the feeling, lol. Took several times for me to get a pic that would stay.
ReactReply - JOJohnOct 28, 2020[quote]I've complained about pipearl4christ, even sending a direct message to TT2 with a link to one of her spread eagle shots. She seemed "shocked" that such a photo existed. It disappeared for a few days, and was then uploaded again. pipearl4christ then blocked me. How did she know I complained? TT2 never answered that question. John aka cobeachbum[/quote] Here's one of pipearl4christ photos that is apparently OK: [url][link]/link/10bff38e4eeefe8a/aHR0cHM6Ly9jZG4udHJ1ZW51ZGlzdHMuY29tL21lZGlhL2EvNS80L2E1NDEwMTZhYzFjM2Q4YmIwYWE3Y2QyYmJjMTMyMGNlMDUyNWEyMjkuanBn[/link]https://cdn.truenudists.com/media/a/5/4/a541016ac1c3d8bb0aa7cd2bbc1320ce0525a229.jpg[/url] John aka cobeachbumReactReply
- MEMemberOct 29, 2020
The difference between a spread eagle male and female photo is this:
A spread eagle female photo is considered 'invitational' whereas a spread eagle male photo is considered to be 'aggressive' and 'forceful'.
Men are considered to be predators and women are not. This may be why male spread eagle photos are not allowed but female photos are.
ReactReply - MEMemberOct 29, 2020[quote]What a stupid sexually biased way to look at things. That's not at you, sunluver, but at the viewpoint itself. Complete hypocrisy, the view point. And women can be aggressive as hell... all these stupid baked in cultural assumptions about gender and sexuality. Drives me nuts sometimes.[/quote] We are also forced to be politically correct these days and it has come to the point where white males are advertised to be the scum of society and who are also perceived and stereotyped by the media to be those who always discriminate against other groups and yet are never discriminated against.ReactReply
- CR
CruzeyFeb 12, 2021[quote] Further amusing note: click "newest sign up" and hit search --- there are TWENTY PAGES of blank profiles with generic name-generated First/Last names of "woman" profiles. Yep. Twenty pages of it. You see a couple of actual profiles tossed in there, but it's almost exclusively suspicious female profiles just waiting to be used by the pornobots.[/quote] As of today, 3 months later the majority of "Newest Signup" profiles are men. Counts up to 398576, which is actually ALL members I think. The worrying thing is that you can delve in by 220 members and you still see a majority of members with no friends, no media and normally no more profile than age and gender who have signed up in the last few hours or days. I think the least that should happen is that the profile should be filled out to say 50% before these members even appear in any lists, and more before they can solicit or accept friends. Although it is understandable that people dip a toe in the water and look around before they venture further, there needs to be some way to limit the fake and sexually oriented members. TrueNudists should not be a site where people advertise prostitution, swap pictures, list nothing in their profile other than a link to a sex oriented website. Why is it some people have no profile and 100s of friends? What human is interested in such a statistic. Are these the pornbots? What use do they serve? Why are they on a True Nudist site? Should this site not cater first for people that are true nudists, rather than voyeurs, exhibitionists, prostitutes, those looking for hookups or bisexual curious engagements? How many members are certified of the 398,000? The answer 22,896. How many with photos? The answer 20,840. Only 815 have videos, and I have never viewed a single one! How many have been members over 2 years? How many have Forum Posts? Only 815, and the majority, if not all, appear to be certified. Also most of these have been members for at least 2 years, with many over 5 years. Of the hundreds I skimmed past I saw one mini-icon I did not recognise. Found it . Looks like a hogs head or a spy. It was T e a m t r u e 1 [remove spaces] and is an A dmin istrat ors profile. How many men? Answer 338,312, which leaves 60,264 for all other categories. A mere 15%. Of those 28,909 women and 21,983 couples, leaving 9,372 for trans and other. Are these realistic ratios for those who are genuine nudists and go camping, swimming, stay at resorts or belong to social nudist clubs? Realistically there are probably 25,000 true nudists on this site. The rest are here for looking or hooking!ReactReply - PA
PaulFeb 12, 2021[quote]Oh, and I don't know about you, but when I go to search page, the profile at the top is always pipearl4christ spreadeagled with her vagina hanging out I've complained about pipearl4christ, even sending a direct message to TT2 with a link to one of her spread eagle shots. She seemed "shocked" that such a photo existed. It disappeared for a few days, and was then uploaded again. pipearl4christ then blocked me. How did she know I complained? TT2 never answered that question. John aka cobeachbum[/quote] I think she is friendly with the owners of this site so she can put any photo up she likes and, if someone complains about her photo that doesn't comply with the rules she knows about and then she blocks them, but in my case I think it was only a comment I made about the type of photos she posts for her to block me.ReactReply - MEMemberFeb 21, 2021
oh waa.
ReactReply