Someone Questionalble — General Discussion on True Nudists

MemberOriginal Poster

Jun 6, 2011

Does this "true nudist" appear a little dodgy to anyone else?http://www.truenudists.com/nudist-women/22099/

ReactReplySubscribe

Replies

RE
rebcpt52
Jun 6, 2011
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yup
ReactReply
CO
Curt, or Cowboy
Jun 6, 2011
The heavily pixelated photos screamed fake when this one showed up long, long ago.
ReactReply
BU
Bud
Jun 6, 2011
Have you talked to her?
ReactReply
MI
MidGaNudist
Jun 6, 2011
Looks like a phony to me
ReactReply
EV
EvansBetterHalf
Jun 6, 2011
[quote]Does this "true nudist" appear a little dodgy to anyone else?http://www.truenudists.com/nudist-women/22099/[/quote] Ya think?????
ReactReply
MA
mallardm45
Jun 6, 2011
Just flag her and move on this one smells way too bad.
ReactReply
TO
Tom
Jun 6, 2011
What's the problem, don't be their friend if their profile bothers you that much, just cause the picture look pixelated doesn't mean they are fake, there are a lot of reasons they are like that.
ReactReply
ME
MemberOriginal Poster
Jun 7, 2011
So I think most of us agree this is a fake profile, but can we flag it just based on our suspicions?
ReactReply
NU
NudeJohnny
Jun 7, 2011
Oh lordy Heavily pixellated photos. Get the pitch forks and flaming torches.
ReactReply
TO
Tom
Jun 7, 2011
So they used a thumbnail pic when they submitted their photos, that is one reason while it ends up pixelated.

God you people need to get of your high horses, no wonder people walk away from naturism with you lot about making them feel bad.
ReactReply
JE
jenorsteve
Jun 7, 2011
[quote]And why would anyone send a thumbnail when creating a thumbnail requires modifying an existing image? Answer: the thumbnail is lifted from another website (usually a porn site) and presented as a photo of the person. It's common. Read and learn from those who know what they're talking about, grasshopper.[/quote] Sorry NIM and a few others - I'm going to disagree with you here. While that profile is a known fake and has been flagged many times by many people over the year or so that it's been here (the originals of her pictures can be found via tineye:http://www.tineye.com/search/a2b2d040041acfe2285f8e08c61176365e9c60c9/) a pixelated picture does NOT automatically mean that some one is a fake. But taken in conjuction with many other factors - we all know it's a fake. When we created our non-mod account so that we could both be in chat at the same time, I purposely uploaded a very small image as our profile picture specifically so that it would be very pixelated. That's just the way I chose to deal with posting a profile picture for our secondary account. My point is that a pixelated picture alone does not a fake make. And I'm only making this point because there are several very well-meaninged members here that get just a little too gungho at times in calling out fakes or flagging profiles. And I am hoping they read this post and see that one of the most well known members on this site (whether you like us or not - chances are good you've seen our posts or chatted with us in the chatroom) has a pixelated picture. LOL, we've been called MANY things on this site...some good, some bad....but never fake! Our profile pic is pixelated and we're about as real it gets.Jen (aka jenorsteve and snugglebunny)
ReactReply
RO
Roosterock
Jun 7, 2011
mallardm45, I do not think we need a witch hunt at this time. There are over a thousand people on this site who should be flagged if we are going to do this person.
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Jun 7, 2011
A thorny question - if the price of loosing 100 fakes was a single member having to change thier pixelated photo? Which way would you go?
With the utmost repect to you Jen.
ReactReply
TO
Tom
Jun 7, 2011
[quote]A thorny question - if the price of loosing 100 fakes was a single member having to change thier pixelated photo? Which way would you go? With the utmost repect to you Jen.[/quote] But that is wrong, one genuine member should not be excluded accidently just to get rid of some suspect members.
ReactReply
ME
Member
Jun 7, 2011
[quote]A thorny question - if the price of loosing 100 fakes was a single member having to change thier pixelated photo? Which way would you go? With the utmost repect to you Jen.[/quote] Tough question, Rene. The reason I did this is because we will NOT post face pics as our profile pic and when I created the account the only pics I had access to were all face pics. So I chose one that we'd used in our album and reduced the size, so that it wouldn't be worth copying. Frankly I could care less one way or another...but...the pic looks great as a thumbnail...so ...if it's ever requested by TT1 that I remove it because it is so pixelated...I will consider it. I'm just hoping that every one got the point of my original posting...a pixelated pic , on it's own, does not make someone a fake. Jen
ReactReply
ME
Member
Jun 7, 2011
[quote]Sister Jen, if I gave the impression that I considered a crappy photo to be the only criterion for judging a fake, I apologize. A crappy photo found by TinEye on porn sites, coupled with an iffy or downright risqué profile and a long list of questionable groups usually spells phony or troublemaker. OTOH, we have had some fairly high quality pix lifted from girly or porn sites, occasionaly resulting in discussions on whether the pics are in fact of the member, since we have no rule against posting them elsewhere, even on smut sites. In the end it's a case by case basis. The profile cited in the OP is a new one to me, but it definitely sounds the klaxon. Peace and blessings![/quote] Not in the least, NIM! Just hoping to curb some of the very well-meaninged but overzealous members. Jen
ReactReply