According to Atlas Obscura, the ancient city of Pompeii, Italy has walls and streets peppered with stone phalluses. It states that scholars consider the depictions of penises to be symbols, with some theories maintaining that the penises were actually good luck signs or symbols meant to ward off the Evil Eye, which is why theyre often found outside homes. Renowned classicist Mary Beard proposes that they simply reflect a masculine society with a penchant for erotic art.
We have something to learn from the past and our "traditional roots."
See https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/stone-phalluses-of-pompeii/
Replies
- MA
MarcusMay 19, 2023You see it in many cultures from the antiquity. For example the indian, greek, roman, celtic, german culture, Penisses were a holy object, sometimes even a god. The same for the vulva by the way. But it is more a topic for the history of erotic art than for nudism.
ReactReply - NUnudeyooperMay 19, 2023
My first thought when reading the title of this thread was the number of times I have heard or read that the penis is ugly. I also believe that it is considered uglier on an older fuller figured man than on one who is young and fit. I also take issue with the publicity videos from nudist venues that make efforts to conceal the penis by shooting only from the waist up, or from the rear, by crossing legs when seated, and by having the well placed plant among others.
ReactReply - MEMemberMay 19, 2023
In Japan, they have a holiday once a year where they paraded a different sizes of phalluses and the men that carried them are only wearing a white linen like the Samo wrestle would wear. Its a symbol of fertility and women who wants to get pregnant idolizes the giant statues of phalluses in a belief that they will get pregnant.
Penises are a part of the male anatomy that is good to look at whether it is erect or not.
ReactReply - SA
Stone AndyOriginal PosterMay 20, 2023In Sweden the second biggest holiday of the year is Midsummer celebrating the solstice with dancing around a maypole. The holiday started as a fertility celebration with the practical purpose of women becoming pregnant since babies born nine months later had the best chance of survival. The original maypole was a phallus with two wreaths representing testicles hanging from it. When the country was Christianized a cross was added. Thank God it didn't become a religious holiday.
ReactReply - PA
PaulMay 20, 2023Christians believe that the human body (which includes the penis) to be the ultimate creation. The Bible says the human body is good, fearfully and wonderfully made, and the temple of the Set-apart Spirt. There is an entire book about joys and pleasures of extra-marital oral sex.
Christians say the human body is the bad, shameful, and obscene, and that it's the cause of lust -- it only makes sense that they would considered the penis to be the worst part of it.
If you're going to have any hope of undemonizing the penis -- you might want to start with Christians.
ReactReply - MEMemberMay 20, 2023[quote]Christians believe that the human body (which includes the penis) to be the ultimate creation. The Bible says the human body is good, fearfully and wonderfully made, and the temple of the Set-apart Spirt. There is an entire book about joys and pleasures of extra-marital oral sex. Christians say the human body is the bad, shameful, and obscene, and that it's the cause of lust -- it only makes sense that they would considered the penis to be the worst part of it. If you're going to have any hope of undemonizing the penis -- you might want to start with Christians.[/quote] And Muslims! They can be just as ignorant. King James Bible: So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.ReactReply
- MEMemberMay 20, 2023
It is best not to lump all members of a certain group as to having certain characteristics or beliefs. There is always a continuum of behaviors and ideals that each will subscribe there to. Your responses to different topics tend to point toward a bias against folks as you espouse an inclusive ideal. Both sides of the coin must be addressed or the stated points ring very, very hollow. In most simple terms, cut Christians a little slack.
ReactReply - ST
StevieLornaMay 20, 2023Well that proves that there have always been guys obsessed with dick.
ReactReply - SA
Stone AndyOriginal PosterMay 20, 2023[quote]If you're going to have any hope of undemonizing the penis -- you might want to start with Christians.[/quote] This is certainly true. Whereas David speaks of being like a tree planted by streams of water, and Jesus speaks of being a naked lily of the valley, the Apostle Paul describes "the thorn in my flesh." The healthiest thing I've done is to realize my Christian teachings conflated everything into a dysfunctional view of the penis, spirit and self. If people in the church can pick, choose and reject their verses, so can I.ReactReply - MEMemberMay 20, 2023
Likewise, *the thorn in my flesh* appears in no uncertain terms not to reference anyones penis. This is a logic leap that I cannot reasonably understand. Ten seconds on the internet found thousands of references and not one referenced a penis. Here is a quick one liner, * is used to describe an annoyance or trouble in one's life.* The article also reported that Pauls affliction was most likely eyesight though nothing categorically states that as fact. As I said earlier, give it a rest. Now, can the topic return to phallic symbolism of the ancient Romans?
ReactReply - EA
EarlDMay 20, 2023Thank you for calling out the one sided biased comments masquerading as victimization [quote]It is best not to lump all members of a certain group as to having certain characteristics or beliefs. There is always a continuum of behaviors and ideals that each will subscribe there to. Your responses to different topics tend to point toward a bias against folks as you espouse an inclusive ideal. Both sides of the coin must be addressed or the stated points ring very, very hollow. In most simple terms, cut Christians a little slack.[/quote]ReactReply - EA
EarlDMay 20, 2023Yep and a bunch of them on this site [quote]Well that proves that there have always been guys obsessed with dick.[/quote]ReactReply - ST
StevieLornaMay 22, 2023The naturist I meet and talk to are not obsessed with their own or anyone elses dick, not like many on the site seem to be.
Reaching back into history to justify or excuse your own obsession and claim it s ok for me to do this because , Im a nudist. Well thats not how most nudist think or act and they think the dick obsessed are just making nudism appear weirder to non nudists.
I wish there was a site like Truedicks, where you could all go and obsess over and compare with other Truedicks and leave naturism to those who enjoy it by not making it weirder.
ReactReply - MEMemberMay 22, 2023
Stevie, now thats a thought. It could be the new *brother* site to TS and have open enrollment, too! Could you imagine the rush of folks to be charter members of the new Truedicks (TD) site? TT1 could offer discount memberships for the first 1000 folks to apply & color code their profile name to demonstrate charter membership status. Oh well, dont think it would happen but it does offer comic relief for non-applicants. And, Stevie, thank you for the humor. Its a good one.
ReactReply - EA
EarlDMay 22, 2023I hear ya Steve You just gotta shake your head when you see the stuff these people come up with to justify their perspective. I am confident even if they had a site like you describe they would still hover around because they arent satisfied doing their own thing in a limited space they have to draw on association with nudism/naturism for validation. [quote]The naturist I meet and talk to are not obsessed with their own or anyone elses dick, not like many on the site seem to be. Reaching back into history to justify or excuse your own obsession and claim it s ok for me to do this because , Im a nudist. Well thats not how most nudist think or act and they think the dick obsessed are just making nudism appear weirder to non nudists. I wish there was a site like Truedicks, where you could all go and obsess over and compare with other Truedicks and leave naturism to those who enjoy it by not making it weirder.[/quote]ReactReply - BI
BillMay 23, 2023First they came for the Christians and I said nothing. Then they came for the Muslims and I still kept quiet. And then they came for me... The post below contradicts itself halfway through, or is this more being half-sarcastic and I'm not catching it? Or is it more about what "they believe" versus what "they say", raising the point of the contradiction running through much of the Book? The Bible is supposedly God's word written by men through a divine connection. This web of contradictions gives the interpreter the ability to gear the teachings they offer toward whatever meaning they care to, even though the underlying message of loving thy neighbor is left essentially intact. [quote]Christians believe that the human body (which includes the penis) to be the ultimate creation. The Bible says the human body is good, fearfully and wonderfully made, and the temple of the Set-apart Spirt. There is an entire book about joys and pleasures of extra-marital oral sex. Christians say the human body is the bad, shameful, and obscene, and that it's the cause of lust -- it only makes sense that they would considered the penis to be the worst part of it. If you're going to have any hope of undemonizing the penis -- you might want to start with Christians.[/quote] Bringing this back to a flippant place -- might the barrage of phallic 'symbols' (dicks growing from the walls) throughout Pompeii be nothing more than a way to have something sexy to lean against for a little pleasure as a person discusses the news of the day, or while waiting for the next prostitute to become available? At least the ones placed around waist high? When Vesuvius popped its load and killed most of the inhabitants, leaving us the vestiges of those heathen's final moments in their ash-built coffins, the horror of their fate frozen in place, I hope at least some of them were fucking when it happened. Talk about the ultimate orgasm! "You make the ground shake for me -- uuh uuh uuh -- u-oh!!"ReactReply - MEMemberMay 24, 2023
Pervasively across all cultures whether we accept it or not , not only is the penis 'demonised' but it is a subset of the inbuilt bias we have around males. Consider the following points:
If I say the word masculinity, many now immediately follow with the word toxicity. The association has become excessively strong in western society and most things considered masculine, including the penis, are by default , now part of a negative bias.
A naked woman is sexy to many but a naked man is not - without a C/O beach here in QLD its not uncommon for police raids on the unofficial C/O beaches. Men get charged, women get warnings...
Its erotic when a woman masturbates, and its disgusting when a man does - Sharon Stone masturbated in the bath tub in the movie "Shiver". This was considered erotic and artistic; can't say any movie scene where a man masturbates is considered anything but porn...
So if wanting to un-demonise the penis there's a lot more work to be done.
ReactReply - ST
StevieLornaMay 24, 2023[quote] If I say the word masculinity, many now immediately follow with the word toxicity. The association has become excessively strong in western society and most things considered masculine, including the penis, are by default , now part of a negative bias. [/quote] You do realise this website is possibly the most visible form of toxic masculinity. Have you considered the reason why no women post on this site, have you consider why there are a fewer women interested in naturism in general? The cock waving brigade often cite that they are the new nudism and old nudism is dying. Thats toxic masculinity, they want their rights to supersede everyone elses. The only way to combat that and stop the negative bias is to call it out where you can.ReactReply - ST
StevieLornaMay 24, 2023[quote] Its erotic when a woman masturbates, and its disgusting when a man does - Sharon Stone masturbated in the bath tub in the movie "Shiver". This was considered erotic and artistic; can't say any movie scene where a man masturbates is considered anything but porn... [/quote] Theres Something about Mary, American pie, just two films with guys wanking, there are many more. Just because you only remember one scene does not mean its a universal fact.ReactReply - SA
Stone AndyOriginal PosterMay 24, 2023[quote]Pervasively across all cultures whether we accept it or not , not only is the penis 'demonised' but it is a subset of the inbuilt bias we have around males. ... So if wanting to un-demonise the penis there's a lot more work to be done.[/quote] Changes over the last generation or two can be welcomed for many reasons, but I believe that the idea of loving your neighbor as yourself includes all your neighbors and all your self. Can we look at how people exercise power as potentially both "empowerment" or "toxic sexuality" despite their gender? Can we look at sexuality as a gift for both penis and vagina holders? Can we check our white, cisgender and other culturally dominant privileges at the door and recognize we have so much to learn from the outsiders and pioneers who not only challenge us but show us vitality and transformed frameworks for new realities? Maybe it's not about undemonizing the penis in general, but humbly requesting to be undemonized ourself as individuals and men while also reflecting how we've thrown our weight and penises around enough historically to need to undemonize a lot of our world views.ReactReply - BI
BillMay 24, 2023[quote]Its erotic when a woman masturbates, and its disgusting when a man does - Sharon Stone masturbated in the bath tub in the movie "Shiver". This was considered erotic and artistic; can't say any movie scene where a man masturbates is considered anything but porn... Theres Something about Mary, American pie, just two films with guys wanking, there are many more. Just because you only remember one scene does not mean its a universal fact.[/quote] A gentle correction -- the movie mentioned with Sharon Stone is "Sliver" and it is a thriller by my weak recollection of it. I bring this up for the people here who may want to see Sharon Stone getting happy and they may get frustrated looking for a movie called "Shiver". If you look up the movie "Tremors" for masturbatory content you will be thwarted as well. The other two movies brought up here that depict guys getting off are comedies, even though not everyone would consider them funny. I happen to love "There's Something About Mary" but my lady thought it was ridiculous when I brought it home for her to watch. "American Pie" seems so sophomoric and all I've seen of it are the trailers and I'll never waste my time there. And now how many sequels are there to "Pie"? I'd love a sequel to "Mary" because I feel that the Farelly brothers are unmatched in brotherly farce production. I feel like a director can get away with more risque content when the themes are less farcical. It would be refreshing to see a serious masculine self-love scene but I'm not sure how a director could get an actor to pull it off without it turning sleazy. Yes, I meant to do that. Trying to picture a guy in a tub surrounded by candles and mood music as the camera zooms in on his face and he contorts into orgasmic bliss just isn't going to work. Can any here remember a movie where such a scene was attempted and it didn't turn into something weird? We would all get along better if comments about someone's memory were put in the suggestion box with a little more sensitivity, regardless of whether that memory is focused on fingering or the movie director's thematic intent.ReactReply - PA
PaulMay 24, 2023[quote]The post below contradicts itself halfway through, or is this more being half-sarcastic and I'm not catching it?[/quote] It's pointing out the contradiction of their beliefs. Christians do believe the human body (including the penis) is the ultimate creation. That belief is well supported in the Bible. The Bible goes on to say the human body is good, fearfully and wonderful made, and the temple of the Set-apart Spirit. Christians believe this as well. But they turn around (away from scripture) and say that the human body is the cause of lust -- the Bible says lust comes from within -- not from something you see. It's you; not what you see. They say, the human body is shameful and obscene (must be kept covered). They frequently quote the passage that says to be modestly dressed -- pretending that it means to be well-covered. That passage sets modesty in opposition to wearing fancy clothing, fancy jewelry, and having fancy hairdos. Nude, would be as modest as someone could get.ReactReply - PA
PaulMay 24, 2023AllChristians
When discussing human experience, it is essentially never correct to use the word, 'All,' in a literal sense. When talking about humans, there are almost always exceptions. Thus, when someone says, 'All,' in reference to human experience, it's proper to interpret that as meaning most or the vast majority.
Although there are Christians who are nudists, the vast majority of Christians see the human body as being shameful and obscene and the primary cause of lust, even though the Bible, itself, contradicts that view of the human body.[/em]ReactReply - EA
EarlDMay 25, 2023Amazing how well you cut straight to the point and completely dismantle these mind boggling perspectives [quote] You do realise this website is possibly the most visible form of toxic masculinity. Have you considered the reason why no women post on this site, have you consider why there are a fewer women interested in naturism in general? The cock waving brigade often cite that they are the new nudism and old nudism is dying. Thats toxic masculinity, they want their rights to supersede everyone elses. The only way to combat that and stop the negative bias is to call it out where you can.[/quote]ReactReply
