Spread Eagle Pics — Rules for posting in here on True Nudists

DesertRatOriginal Poster

Sep 15, 2011

There are some pics posted of a 66 year old woman in a spread eagle position. In case they didn't know, I sent a note to the couple atBoDe_Cand reminded them that these types of pics were frowned upon. I didn't flag them hoping the pics would be removed. If the pics are not removed soon, I will probably go ahead and flag them. If anyone else feels that they should be flagged that is your call.

ReactReplySubscribe

Replies

SO
Soupie
Sep 15, 2011
There's a lot of them on here. What are you objecting to? Her age? I know that Pi Pearl does it for christ. Isn't that a good reason?
ReactReply
CO
Curt, or Cowboy
Sep 15, 2011
[quote]There are some pics posted of a 66 year old woman in a spread eagle position. In case they didn't know, I sent a note to the couple atBoDe_Cand reminded them that these types of pics were frowned upon. [/quote] Either removed, or tagged friends only. I can't see them.
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Sep 15, 2011
[quote]There's a lot of them on here. What are you objecting to? Her age? I know that Pi Pearl does it for christ. Isn't that a good reason?[/quote] You know fine it is not a good reason, LOL. And TT1 likes it so who are we? I wonder how TT2 feels? But hey I only see 5 photos now and untill there is a 'level playing field' it will remain that way.
ReactReply
DW
Dario Western
Sep 15, 2011
Spreadeagled pics are for porn sites, not ones like this.
ReactReply
ME
Meb2467
Sep 15, 2011
agree should not be any spread eagle pics....if you just look at tn and not log in you can see one all the time not good!
ReactReply
PI
pinewood
Sep 15, 2011
Ya , what about Pi Pearl ? She's about as spread eagle as they come.Her pics are " spread " all over this site. I think she's either using religion as an excuse to spread her legs, or she's got herself completely brainwashed into thinking she's just showing " The beauty of God's creation " when she's spreading her legs about as far as she can without poppin' a joint out of socket. It's not that I really mind the pics , ( I kind of like them ! lol ) I just don't like double standards and hypocrites.
ReactReply
NE
New2coptional
Sep 15, 2011
either you think the nude body is good or you don't to oppose one section of the body is hypocritical. A spread eagle is no more or no less than a dick shot or a face shot. It is a body part. Second you seem to just want attention. To pm them then put them on blast on here just screams self sanctimonious.
ReactReply
ME
Member
Sep 16, 2011
when nudists/people feel that they must flaunt their crotches for others, it's only to stroke their own.....
.....EGO....
Real Nudists don't care what other people look like, nudism is about self acceptance and about one's own freedom of not hiding what God gave them, not flaunting it....real nudists don't care....period.
Steve
ReactReply
ME
Member
Sep 16, 2011
So, think of the body as a whole, accept the person, not the appearance, and forget about the bits in between, for in those bits, lie an entirely different function and purpose.
ReactReply
MI
misterbean
Sep 16, 2011
So now we know where to come when we need poor quality "Morality Police"
Just a quick look at 'Your' Friends list and we assume that you are able to distinguish between one 'particular' 'spread eagle picture' which is OK - yet you are alarmed by another.
I think it now complels you, absolutely, to explain with Clarity, why the Spread Eagle fotos you have added on Your profile as your friends are acceptable ~ yet you need to "out" another.
Don't they pass your perceptions of age , attractiveness, ?? your ideas of intent.
An apology is well called for lest you be called 'out' for sheer and utter hypocrisy.
Furthermore, perhaps you should sanction a re-structure of all male genitalia; which appears to be , in every instance, even more apparent.
Better I think just to bypass the Pics that YOU do not aprove of - and leave the rest of us to make our own decisions.
There's been a few changes in the last several decades, since the FKK movements and their quasi liberalism died from a lack of .
interest.
We don't also agree with everything we see.
But we'll wait for you to catch up.
ReactReply
DW
Dario Western
Sep 16, 2011
[quote]So now we know where to come when we need poor quality "Morality Police" Just a quick look at 'Your' Friends list and we assume that you are able to distinguish between one 'particular' 'spread eagle picture' which is OK - yet you are alarmed by another. I think it now complels you, absolutely, to explain with Clarity, why the Spread Eagle fotos you have added on Your profile as your friends are acceptable ~ yet you need to "out" another. Don't they pass your perceptions of age , attractiveness, ?? your ideas of intent. An apology is well called for lest you be called 'out' for sheer and utter hypocrisy. Furthermore, perhaps you should sanction a re-structure of all male genitalia; which appears to be , in every instance, even more apparent. Better I think just to bypass the Pics that YOU do not aprove of - and leave the rest of us to make our own decisions. There's been a few changes in the last several decades, since the FKK movements and their quasi liberalism died from a lack of . interest. We don't also agree with everything we see. But we'll wait for you to catch up.[/quote] If we want to be respected and taken seriously by mainstream society, then we've got to adopt their morality - just with no clothes on. If we go saying "nudism is not about sex or sexual exhibitionism" and tolerate spread-eagled shots, then we've no one to blame but ourselves when the rest of society laughs at us.
ReactReply
MI
misterbean
Sep 16, 2011
If we want to be respected and taken seriously by mainstream society,
then we've got to adopt their morality - just with no clothes on. If we
go saying "nudism is not about sex or sexual exhibitionism" and
tolerate spread-eagled shots, then we've no one to blame but ourselves
when the rest of society laughs at us.
If we try top pretend that we don't have the same span of people as society.
If we try and pretend we have no interest in sex or sexuality.
If we try to suggest that we also don't have the same Good , Bad, and the Ugly.
If we try and pretend that the average age of nudists is now terribly non-representative of any other society.
If we refuse to accept that there is now a whole new demographic with the young nudists.
Worse still if we disenchant another generation of young potential Nudists.
Worst of all if we try and refuse individual rights and freedoms, even for women.
Or try and tell individuals what they have a right to see or ignore.
Then we are no better , or worse, than much of mainstream society.
ReactReply
BL
blackbird1
Sep 16, 2011
Well said Mister Bean!
ReactReply
NO
None
Sep 16, 2011
Actually if guys are allowed to have spread eagle pics than the women should be allowed also. Just like in real society if men are allowed to go bare chested women should be allowed to go bare chested. If all the spread eagle pics of women are to be removed than all the spread eagle pics of men should be removed period.
ReactReply
BL
blackbird1
Sep 16, 2011
[quote] As I said before.... Tolerance, people! "Judge not, lest ye be judged".Mostpeople don't like to be judged, and if they are... They sometimes come back to bite you in the @ss.[/quote] I agree! Some tolerance please. I am a naturist, not a nudist but nudists are ok with me. I read postings from some "supernudists" which really offend me. They are more prude than many textile people :-( I am a nudist for 35 years and I respect everyone. As long as there are no porn pictures, it is ok for me. If you are nude, some poses are possible without offending anyone.
ReactReply
OO
oosuntanmanjerry
Sep 16, 2011
what is your problem
ReactReply
NO
None
Sep 16, 2011
[quote][quote]Actually if guys are allowed to have spread eagle pics than the women should be allowed also. Just like in real society if men are allowed to go bare chested women should be allowed to go bare chested. If all the spread eagle pics of women are to be removed than all the spread eagle pics of men should be removed period. [/quote] Well I really find it very funny now . Whenever a female's photos are in question , we are accused of being biased towards men and when a male member's photos are in question , they accuse us of being homophobic and biased towards women . Before shooting off such irresponsible statements , please take the pains to go through the flagging2 thread .[/quote] Shooting off irresponsible statements? What are you talking about? If women can not have spread eagle pics on this site then men should not be able to have spread eagle pics on this site. What exactly is irresponsible with that statement? What part exactly is confusing you. Whats good for the goose is also good for the gander as it were.
ReactReply
PH
Philfreeeuk
Sep 16, 2011
It amazes me how all the "Tolerant" people jump in with a defence, without even seeing the pic in question. It is nothing short of gross, and would probably not even get on a sex site. Go take a look, you'll find the url to it here on comment #2716, and then come back and tell me that you think it's an appropriate representation of the nudist lifestyle.

EDIT:

Point made, link removed.
ReactReply
CO
Curt, or Cowboy
Sep 16, 2011
Phil,
I understand your perspective, and agree with it, to a point.
The profile in question has seen fit to remove such photo.
At this point, perhaps the link is best left to private communications ?
Perhaps they have learned ?
From other content on the site, and the picture comments here and there, it is quite possible
that they took their queue from some existing "site content," however since they *have*
responded by removing such, I'm inclined to give 'em a pass, pending future behaviour.
As has been said for some time, the failure of administration to police photographs is not
blameless in the additional photos, and their content.
Sure, eventually he gets a round tuit, but by then they've been seen, and queued others
into what is *apparently* acceptable, sometimes even encouraged.
There is a snowball affect.
ReactReply
PH
Philfreeeuk
Sep 16, 2011
[quote]Phil, I understand your perspective, and agree with it, to a point. The profile in question has seen fit to remove such photo. At this point, perhaps the link is best left to private communications ? Perhaps they have learned ? From other content on the site, and the picture comments here and there, it is quite possible that they took their queue from some existing "site content," however since they *have* responded by removing such, I'm inclined to give 'em a pass, pending future behaviour. As has been said for some time, the failure of administration to police photographs is not blameless in the additional photos, and their content. Sure, eventually he gets a round tuit, but by then they've been seen, and queued others into what is *apparently* acceptable, sometimes even encouraged. There is a snowball affect.[/quote] Totally agree Curt, I'll remove this link later.
ReactReply
DE
DesertRatOriginal Poster
Sep 16, 2011
[quote] Gee, I have a question..... Why did you send them a Private Message", just to turn around and out them in the public forum, telling us that you sent them a "Private Message"? Somehow, this isn't adding up. Tolerance, people![/quote] I sent a private message and when nothing changed after the message was sent, I went public. The message that I sent directed them to the rules and regs. thinking that they may be unaware of them. One of the reasons that I did not flag them was due to the fact that this does not seem to be high on TT1's list of priorties. I finally received a message back for the couple and they seem fine with the picture.
ReactReply
ME
Member
Sep 16, 2011
Think spread eagles shots whether male or male are inappropriate on a TRUE NUDIST WEBSITE!! I think like others posted they call attention to one's genitals and not in the true spirit of what nudism/naturism is all about.
ReactReply
SO
Soupie
Sep 16, 2011
What is all the fuss about? Just ask NiMA to take down his pic and cross his legs. The only exception should be if you are spreading your legs "4 christ".
ReactReply
NO
None
Sep 16, 2011
[quote]Bothmen and women are not allowedto upload spread eagle photos on this site . Period . If you come across any male member having a spread eagle photo , flag him . It is not possible for TT1 to keep an eye on every member's photos especially at the rate at which photos are dumped on this site on a daily basis .[/quote] If we come across any males with a spread eagle pic? How about the main pic on the site most of the time? I am not defending anyone for the spread eagle pics but if you want the male ones removed flag them all. I dont flag anyone period I also do not request friends. I did flag one person who had a very young girls photos and will do so again in a heart beat. I dont flag people at the beach and I don't flag people at nudists resorts you should vist one sometime you will actually see people sunning themselves with their legs spread. I know that may come as a shock but it really is true.
ReactReply