Replies
- TH
ThomasSep 8, 2010[quote]We love the mods. they are doing a kick ass job.[/quote] Thanks for the kind words, we try to do our best.ReactReply - MEMemberOriginal PosterSep 9, 2010
needs to stay on home page for a bit
ReactReply - RE
renebbareSep 9, 2010[quote]We love the mods. they are doing a kick ass job.[/quote]
In agreement.ReactReply - PH
PhilfreeeukSep 9, 2010Good job! ... Jen, I'll link this in to thecomputer club FAQ's.This old box still won't let me go and play in the chat room, but I'm hearing that it's a million times better now. This is one message I received, from one very happy bunny. "Just droppin by to see how its going. Wish you could see the change that Mods in the chatroom have made. I actually enjoy chatting now. No more fights, jerkin off on cam or any of that other bull." After all the hassle, this is sooooooooo good to hear, maybe now, the ladies will stick around long enough to see what a GREAT site, AND, what a great community, this really is. Phil.ReactReply - MEMemberOriginal PosterSep 9, 2010
Thanks everyone! It's great to get positive feedback. While I understand that not everyone is happy or in agreement with the chat room being moderated, it's nice to know there are those who are seeing a positive change and are coming back to chat.
Phil, thank you for sharing that message.
JenReactReply - MEMemberSep 9, 2010[quote]Thanks everyone! It's great to get positive feedback. While I understand that not everyone is not happy or in agreement with the chat room being moderated, it's nice to know there are those who are seeing a positive change and are coming back to chat. Phil, thank you for sharing that message. Jen[/quote] Excellent explanation of the mod''s job. However, the face answer is a bit fuzzy, lmao! Speaking of fuzzy, IMHO, I suggest Steve be know as the "The Big Bunny" when he is on duty as Mod. Of course, you may remain the "SnuggleBunny" when on duty. "Big Bunny", I do apologize for the disagreement I had with you in the chat room. Please accept my apology, I should have locked heads with you in pm or pc .my error, my fault.ReactReply
- BL
blueiron35Sep 9, 2010The mods are definately making a huge difference. Great to see them taking time out of their days to help keep the site friendly for everyone.
ReactReply - PH
PhilfreeeukSep 9, 2010[quote]Thanks everyone! It's great to get positive feedback. While I understand that not everyone is not happy or in agreement with the chat room being moderated, it's nice to know there are those who are seeing a positive change and are coming back to chat. Phil, thank you for sharing that message. Jen[/quote] I can't imagine why any decent true nudist would be unhappy that the chat room is now moderated. Surely if they are, it can only be because they want to conduct themselves in a manner that contravenes the rules, and if that's the case, they should not be in there. Simple. The only reason that I can think of, is that if a moderator were to get too heavy handed. I can't see that happening, but if it were to, I'm quite sure that the other mods would be quick to deal with him/her. Phil. btw, even though I can't use it, I'm so glad that it's been sorted, it makes the whole site, a much more desirable place to be.

ReactReply - BL
blueiron35Sep 9, 2010Sure would be a blast if we could get you in there Phil!
ReactReply - CA
catbirdSep 9, 2010I too think that the moderators are doing an excellent job. I had quit using the chat room. I have now come back to the chat room.
ReactReply - MEMemberOriginal PosterSep 10, 2010
A must read for all wanting to participate in chat, it's fun in there again/now!
ReactReply - CD
Cheri Donna DawsonSep 10, 2010Yesterday was my first visit to the chat room in a VERY long time. It was relaxing and fun. When I told one person who PMd me that I prefer to chat in the room, he stopped.
ReactReply - MEMemberSep 10, 2010[quote]Yesterday was my first visit to the chat room in a VERY long time. It was relaxing and fun. When I told one person who PMd me that I prefer to chat in the room, he stopped. [/quote] I enjoyed our brief chat andam glad you may come back more often.I agree we need to have people in the public chat. Too many are using PM, Whisper, or going completely under the radar with private video. The private video has it's own problems but at least it will not be overt in the public chat room.ReactReply
- LI
limestone26Sep 10, 2010I may just try the chat room again, Snuggle.
ReactReply - RE
renebbareSep 11, 2010I find the constant listing of joiners and eavers to the room makes it difficult to chat easily in the open room. It would be helpful to be able to turn this off[/quote] I have to go with you on that one it disturbs me as I am reading the posts.ReactReply - RI
riya222222Sep 15, 2010If you locked my chat room. Then what can i do for unlock.
ReactReply - MEMemberSep 15, 2010TN has grown to be the worlds leading nudist website much in part due to the way it has evolved in a manner of being a nudist site formed by nudists for nudists. In a manner of speaking we are the mods with our flagging system implemented by TT1, so even if we see abuse coming from a mod do not hesitate to flag their actions, as we have done because TT1 knows they are just as human as every one else. So we are the mods for the mods! you can also download the printkey program to capture screen events of their actions the same as they do and report it as abuse. All of the Mods are only over the CHAT section of TN, and any mod madness in the forum has only the same power as any other user to flag people, they do however congregate together to flag in concert things they feel may be in violation of the TOS or photo guidelines. However some of them have failed to clearly understand the written guidelines and try to use their own interpretations that defy the guidelines as written by TT1. If you feel that they have altered from the written guidelines you should as many of us are doing flag them for abuse of power. If you can not find a free screen capture program ask me and I will Google it for you and give you the URL. Do your part to keep TN the fastest growing and leading nudist website on the internet. BTW most of the mods are doing a great job for the most part in the CHAT rooms
ReactReply - MEMemberOriginal PosterSep 15, 2010
Out of respect for each member and to protect everyone's privacy we will NOT discuss publicly why ANY ONE was kicked out of the room. That is an issue between the moderator, the member and TT1. If anyone feels that they have been abused by ANY moderator we encourage them to report it to site admin at abuse@truenudists.com. Keep in mind, that we fully document exactly why any one has been kicked out in case TT1 has any questions.
If any one has been permanently banned from the chat room or removed from the site, that was a choice made by site admin. Moderators do NOT have that ability.ReactReply - BL
blueiron35Sep 16, 2010I have said it before and ill say it again. The mods are doing a great job. Like anything else in life there will be a few glitches with the system set up, it doesnt change the fact that the mods have made a huge difference in the way the room is moving now. I have yet to hear of anyone blocked without a warning message. So when you get a warning, guess what, your doing something wrong. Holy crap, that is simple folks. There is never going to be a way to keep everyone happy at the same time about every aspect of the site, thats not a possibility.
The mods were put in place by TT1, it was not a spur of the moment thing. This has been a topic for as long as I have been here. TT1 knows who he placed in the positions, he watched them in the chatroom, he watched their posts, he knows them through messages and emails. If he did not feel as though they were right for the job then they wouldnt be mods. As has been said before, this is a private site and the owner has placed those he feels are right for the positions where he needs them.
The rules are very clearly outlined before you enter the chatroom. If while in chat you receive a warning, message or anything else from a mod then simply do as you are asked. Give this a little time to have all the kinks worked out and see how much better it can be.
ReactReply - MEMemberSep 16, 2010[quote][quote]Out of respect for each member and to protect everyone's privacy we will NOT discuss publicly why ANY ONE was kicked out of the room. That is an issue between the moderator, the member and TT1. If anyone feels that they have been abused by ANY moderator we encourage them to report it to site admin at abuse@truenudists.com. Keep in mind, that we fully document exactly why any one has been kicked out in case TT1 has any questions. If any one has been permanently banned from the chat room or removed from the site, that was a choice made by site admin. Moderators do NOT have that ability.[/quote] Ok, this I understand. But I have a question here. How come the same respect for everyone's privacy is not shown when it comes to flagging individuals for alleged profile and picture violations. Ok, I think the process by which one flags somebody for breaking the rules is useful and serves a good purpose on TN. Where I see a problem is when notices are put up in forums such as 'Another Day, Another Flagging 2', their purpose being to bring atttention to an alleged rule breaker so others can flag this individual. This is all fine and good but what about the instances where after the person has been flagged TT1 decides that the person hasnt broken any rules and their pictures remain and no action is taken again this person despite having been flagged multiple times? What happens then is the person is then branded on this site for having broken a rule when our site administrator has decided that this isn't the case. A forum post is then left up regarding the persons alleged 'offence' forever to be read by other certified readers. Can someone address the issue of privacy in this instance?[/quote] This is a very important issue you bring up cesssez, and we see it is not being addressed well. We record the URL's that they post flaggings when we can see and think the pics are in compliance to TT rules, some appear questionable, so we record the URSL's and give it a week or so and if we go back and see that those allegation pictures are still posted we have a more clear interpretation of what TT means as written in the websites guidelines. Perhaps we will post sometime our collective results so others can see what has been flagged wrongfully and what is in compliance. It is clear some of the mods moderate on others sites as well as here thus some of them might inadvertently use rules from other sites and not be accurate to this sites rules and guidelines, as it is clear the mods are in a refining state as we and TN progress. Posts like yours and ours help the refining process, so keep up posting your concerns they are much needed during this refining process.ReactReply
- PH
PhilfreeeukSep 16, 2010Very well said, Jane (#33), Blue #34) and R & B (#36) (Love that last comment :) ________________________________________________________ [quote]Ok, this I understand. But I have a question here. How come the same respect for everyone's privacy is not shown when it comes to flagging individuals for alleged profile and picture violations. Ok, I think the process by which one flags somebody for breaking the rules is useful and serves a good purpose on TN. Where I see a problem is when notices are put up in forums such as 'Another Day, Another Flagging 2', their purpose being to bring atttention to an alleged rule breaker so others can flag this individual. This is all fine and good but what about the instances where after the person has been flagged TT1 decides that the person hasnt broken any rules and their pictures remain and no action is taken again this person despite having been flagged multiple times? What happens then is the person is then branded on this site for having broken a rule when our site administrator has decided that this isn't the case. A forum post is then left up regarding the persons alleged 'offence' forever to be read by other certified readers. Can someone address the issue of privacy in this instance?[/quote] Cess, it's called "freedom of speech" Bad behaviour, does not attract and encourage respect. In any case, profiles are anonymous, unless you choose to disclose your identity. Imho, the chat room is not as public, as the rest of the site, offences are usually far more serious and therefore potentially more embarrassing. It is only fit and proper, that they should be dealt with in private. With regard to the rest of the site. Where complaints are subjective, if the picture or alleged offence remains, then it is obvious that TT does not consider it requires removal. Imho, this is akin to being found not guilty. As you know, ... there is always the option to change username or even create a new profile. If TT were of the opinion that this practise is undesirable, he would probably have deleted the"Another Day, Another flagging"thread. by now, and he continues to have that option. This is a private site, we all agree to abide by the owners rules and philosophy. If we disagree, we have the option to complain in writing, and if not satisfied with the result, are free to leave. ______________________________________________________ [quote]This is a very important issue you bring up cesssez, and we see it is not being addressed well. We record the URL's that they post flaggings when we can see and think the pics are in compliance to TT rules, some appear questionable, so we record the URSL's and give it a week or so and if we go back and see that those allegation pictures are still posted we have a more clear interpretation of what TT means as written in the websites guidelines. Perhaps we will post sometime our collective results so others can see what has been flagged wrongfully and what is in compliance. It is clear some of the mods moderate on others sites as well as here thus some of them might inadvertently use rules from other sites and not be accurate to this sites rules and guidelines, as it is clear the mods are in a refining state as we and TN progress. Posts like yours and ours help the refining process, so keep up posting your concerns they are much needed during this refining process.[/quote] Vic, and/or Jane, "WRONGFUL FLAGGING" ? ... Now I'M, ...... ROFLMAO. You are wasting your time. TT clearly states on his blog: 3000 users!!! October 23rd, 2008http://www.truenudists.com/blog/[quote]2. Help patrol the site. This is probably the most useful thing any user can do. Pervs creep in when users allow it.If someone is acting sexually or inappropriate please flag their profile.There is also a place to specify what they have done to deserve the flagging. Please use it.[/quote] He is clearly asking us to flag, when, IN OUR OPINION, someone is acting inappropriately. Therefore, if we think it deserves a flag, it CANNOT be wrong. Wrongful flagging, is a complete "None Issue" IRRELEVANT.It is TT who makes the decisions, no one else!If anyone is insensitive or bloody minded enough to offend the membership, they run the risk of being flagged, and making an appearance on the"Another Day, Another flagging"thread. No doubt the number of flags that a profile gets, helps TT to gauge the memberships opinion, therefore by bringing an incident to the members attention, will help in this process, and may even act as a deterrent.ReactReply - PH
PhilfreeeukSep 17, 2010[quote]Some time ago, you flagged a friend of mine and published her name in this forum. This was about two weeks ago. she even replied in the forum to ask what you thought she had done wrong. Anyway, all well and good. You thought there was a violation of rules and you flagged her which you have every right to do and fair enough. But your complaint was not upheld by TT1. And the photo which you deemed as inappropriate still remains on her profile. The profile has not been modified at all. So now it would appear that my friend has broken no rules and done nothing wrong as determined by the site administrator.[/quote] I assume you are talking about comment #20, as this is the only one to reply. In this instance, I'm afraid you are most definitely, very much mistaken. As stated in the update, she immediately changed her profile pic, and either deleted or set the offending one to "friends only" AND then had the cheek to ask what she had done wrong. My response was to ignore her comment and repost the updated. Comment #31. As to the rest, we will have to agree to disagree. I stand by my actions. I will of course be guided by TT, should he wish to make his position known, and listen to anyone who feels they have a justifiable complaint, I do make mistakes. Interestingly, no one else has complained.ReactReply - CO
Curt, or CowboyOct 2, 2010Site bug
ReactReply - CO
Curt, or CowboyOct 2, 2010[quote]Bunny I have to disagree that "freedom of speech does not apply on a privately owned site" TOTALLY incorrect, freedom of speech applies to everywhere in the free world. [/quote] While I agree with most of what you say, on this point you are wrong. Internet is international by nature, crosses jurisdictions, etc. THIS site happens to be hosted in a "free" country in some part of the "free world" but the same can not be said for ALL of the members, or visitors. What may well be allowed and acceptable in San Francisco, is not necessarily allowed or acceptable in Singapoor, or Cairo, or Moscow. Free speech does NOT necessarily apply. In fact, "free speech" is merely an abstract idea codified within the USA, and perhaps a few other jurisdictions, but is not universally applicable the world over. We are still subject to the political restrictions of the jurisdiction where we happen to be at the moment. Any website is subject to the restrictions of the hosting jurisdiction at a minimum. A privately owned site, such as this one, is much like the owner's living room, and therefore subject to the additional restrictions placed by the owner, reasonable or not, whatever they are. This owner has imposed certain rules, most of which I've no issue with. That's his option. THIS owner has decided to empower certain individuals with certain responsibilities, subject to the owner's approval. That one or more of those individuals may or may not act in accord with what you or I think may be apropo in any given situation is irrelevant. That's between the mods and the owner. This owner has instituted a flagging system. His option, and that's fine. That it may, or may not, encourage behaviour that you or I might see as juvinile is also irrelevant. It's the closest thing to self-police while preventing anarchy as he could come, in his opinion, I suppose. The bottom line is that, just like in my living room, there is no "free speech." There are the freedoms that the owner allows. No more, and perhaps less depending on the jurisdiction where you are at the moment. It may or may not be in the "free" world.ReactReply
