I am asking all of you ladies this question!! How do you want your male partner to be? I'm asking this because, because I have been the long journey of restoring my natural look !!
Replies
- MEMemberSep 7, 2020[quote]I really dont care about your penis, the only person who seems to care about your penis is you. This is first and foremost a NUDIST side, and the fact that the first thing that comes up with nudity is "OOH THEY CAN SEE MY PEE PEE' and then the glorious tales are all about the genitals of course! Has it ever..I mean ever occured to you that the lack of women on this forum (or other forums for that matter) are the consequences of men jamming their penis questions in virtually every topic? Does it exite you, to talk about your penis? You get a kick out of it? Nudism isnt like this, it has nothing to do with genitals or even a focus on it. I might as well, start a forum about I should wear a ring on my left hand or my right hand? should I wear nailpolish too? what color? can I wear red nail polish when I'm nude? what you guys think? See how ridiculous you sound..Justwrap that penis into gift paper and send it to Guatamala, problems solved! Nina[/quote] Another [ Like]ReactReply
- MEMemberSep 7, 2020[quote]I really dont care about your penis, the only person who seems to care about your penis is you. This is first and foremost a NUDIST side, and the fact that the first thing that comes up with nudity is "OOH THEY CAN SEE MY PEE PEE' and then the glorious tales are all about the genitals of course! Has it ever..I mean ever occured to you that the lack of women on this forum (or other forums for that matter) are the consequences of men jamming their penis questions in virtually every topic? Does it exite you, to talk about your penis? You get a kick out of it? Nudism isnt like this, it has nothing to do with genitals or even a focus on it. I might as well, start a forum about I should wear a ring on my left hand or my right hand? should I wear nailpolish too? what color? can I wear red nail polish when I'm nude? what you guys think? See how ridiculous you sound..Justwrap that penis into gift paper and send it to Guatamala, problems solved! Nina[/quote] U are so right! A bow for u Streetpoet.ReactReply
- JO
JohnSep 7, 2020This whole discussion is so weird. I mean, can you imagine a woman starting a thread in "The Men's Room" saying, "Guys, how do you like your women? Natural boobs, or artificial ones? Big ones, or small ones? Have any of your women friends had surgery to reduce their inner labia, and how did you feel about it?"
And women posting responses about the breast and labial surgeries they've had done, and the reasons they did it.
Nope. It's just another example of us fixating on things that make no real difference at all for true naturism. It's just calling attention to body parts that we usually don't talk about because they're covered up, and now all of a sudden their appearance is sooo important and we've got to talk about it.
If a woman wants her breasts reduced or increased in size, it's her goddamn business and nobody else's. Or nose jobs, or whatever. And if a guy is circumcised or not, it's his goddamn business and nobody else's.
ReactReply - RIRichardNov 26, 2020
Unusual in Sweden
ReactReply - JOJohnApr 30, 2021em1dub wrote: [quote] Nature and evolution didn't make just one mistake in the design of the human body which we all celebrate as naturists. [/quote] Well, I can't agree with you on that. There are a number of flaws in our design, like using the same duct for breathing as for swallowing, or backs that are prone to straining. And somebody said that God wouldn't have been a good civil engineer, since "Who in his right mind would position a sewage dump right next to a recreational area?" But I do agree that we should leave foreskins alone. My parents opted for circumcision, and I'm stuck with it, but I'm not going to go around singing its praises. It was thought at the time that there was a correlation between foreskins and venereal disease. Now we know better, and we know that with proper hygiene, we can stop worrying about it.ReactReply
- RO
roffdusenMay 4, 2021It has been confirmed here that women find uncut cocks disgusting....which they are. The longer the foreskin the more disgusting. The noble penis displays a fine helmet head, not an unsightly anteater.
I am flabbergasted at the number of you uncircumcised men who won't roll your sleeve up (so to speak). You are so lacking in imagination that you haven't given this serious thought? Really?
Just to summarize - it's not a good look, ok? The beauty is you don't need adult surgery, just peel it back. It will shrink over time.
Ur welcome.ReactReply - SA
Stone AndyMay 4, 2021[quote]Thinking logically, referring to a man as you do as being uncircumcised is hilarious. Do you also refer to men with all four limbs as being unamputated? And are we all undecapitated?[/quote] You make a good point Em! As Monty Python would put it, circumcision is "just a flesh wound" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UijhbHvxWrAReactReply - TJ
TJMay 4, 2021Just as some people get tired of people discussing their "per pees", I'm worn slap out with people getting completely bent out of the fucking frame at any mention of it.
It doesn't matter that was posted in a "women's forum". It could have been posted in the men's forum or even the "sex and sexuality" forum. You can bet your left tit or testicle their STILL would have been someone rolling in with sirens blaring from the Purity Patrol, ready to issue a stink eye and a stern finger wagging about how "this has nothing to do with naturism".
Yes, it does. In as much as genitalia is a part of the human body and sexuality a part of human experience it does. We know - we KNOW - that nudity does not equate to sex. How coukd we not know? There's someone screaming it at every turn, it seems. That still doesn't mran it isn't part if the equation. People always say "there are other places blah blah blah" whenever ANY discussion that even partially touches on sex is attempted. Guess what? I don't WANT to go to a porn site to have a legitimate adult discussion I should be able to have right here among adults.
There IS a societal stigma against cut vs. uncut here in the US and ir IS a valid topic of discussion, and frankly women need to get the fick over it and stop actibg si goddamn indignant about shit.
There is ao much sexism in the nudism community in terms of how it treats men to begin with. That whole "ermagherd! he's got an erection" business is such bullshit. Unless there is accomoanying suggestive behavior along with it, all you're doing is stigmatizing a body part and function. And save it with all that "not a part of nudism" crap when women can - and frequently do - post photos of themselves sitting with their ankles in separate time zones and their hands down at their pusses - sometimes even parting the lips - and no one says a goddamn thing.
You're worn out on dick discussions? I'm worn out on the attempted excising of all things sexual from our nudist lives. It's only the exhausting crusades against it that piss me off enough to want to tell everyone:
"Come look at my pee pee!"ReactReply - ROroffdusenMay 4, 2021
Perhaps unsubtle to get the message across that women don't like them. And remember they have to suck them; not you. There is clear evidence here that WOMEN DON'T LIKE THEM. I proposed an easy non-surgical alternative.
The amputee comparison is a bit extreme. The "this is how God made me, can't do anything about it" mentality galls me a tad. Because there is something you can do about it. I've told you what. Some uncut don't look too bad, but the 2 inch foreskin....yucky.
Can some women wade in here since it is your forum site. A circumcised penis is clearly more attractive. I doubt a single woman would argue that.ReactReply - JOJohnMay 5, 2021roffdusen wrote: [quote] There is clear evidence here that WOMEN DON'T LIKE THEM.[/quote] Please cite your source for this "clear evidence"... one that's a little more substantial than a few women posting their opinions while ignoring other postings by women that say that they don't care. The women I know all seem to fall into the latter category.ReactReply
- BE
BenMay 6, 2021When erect, it's very difficult, near impossible, to tell if a mans circumcised or not, IMO, it's just a superficial thing. I was circumcised at birth, am able to have outrageous orgasms, mind blowing lingual massages from heaven, thankyou to amazing women, however, I absolutely say NO to what was done to me as a newborn baby. I can't remember the pain, besides the point, hygiene wise, men have a personal responsibility to keep that part clean, if non circumcised (normal penis). Common sense. Don't need the medical industry to take responsibility of that. On a side note, I have to say, women mutilating their vulva's to be more streamlined, thus more "mainstream" attractive, is very, very, very distressing. Where do they get these idea's from, "ahem", what is imposing these value's on women...maybe the same thing that causes women life threatening eating disorders, you get the idea, where does this peer pressure come from??? Sorry for getting off topic, but I just despise it!
ReactReply - SAStone AndyMay 6, 2021
My 16 year old son brought up the topic of circumcision last night at dinner. He was told in his high school health class that it's the norm and done for hygienic reasons, and questioned why he wasn't "normal". I explained that I didn't want his nerve and pleasure tissue to be cut off from him without his consent. I also told him that ears are easier to clean if they're cut off, but it's not helping anything. His health class didn't talk about female circumcision which I told him is also called genital mutilation. I explained people could just as well turn things around and say female circumcision is hygienic and male circumcision is genital mutilation. It's a cultural not scientific bias.
My son understands that I didn't want to take away anything that God gave him that is perfect until there is something wrong. He knows that I regret my parents cut me despite growing up in a culture where circumcision is not the norm so I could "fit in". He also undertands he's free to get the chop himself when he turns 18. He's too immature to feel strongly one way or the other, but I'd rather he has freedom than permanent cultural alternation.ReactReply - SAStone AndyMay 6, 2021[quote]My sons are similar ages to yours. Being Irish / European there was never any question of circumcision. Its only done here in exceptional circumstances. One of their friends was circumcised at 11 for medical reasons. He got great sympathy from all his friends and most of them had never seen a circumcised penis before. THATS normal![/quote] US educators are wise in choosing their words carefully to present the norm and expectation without objectively stating it. When my sons were born, the doctor looked at me in the eyes and asked if I was SURE I didn't want the routine circumcision. "It's free you know." Those words stuck to me. We paid a flat "birthing fee" of less than $1,000 - the same as an emergency room deductible for falling off a ladder - for our sons birth. Inquring, I found out that my insurance paid a flat $800 for a male circumcision which takes all of 3 minutes. That's a good profit center. Of course circumcision is the norm until dads like me are willing to say NO to the authority of a doctor in full surgical gear. Follow the money.ReactReply
- BR
Brett RapleyMay 6, 2021[quote]Just as some people get tired of people discussing their "per pees", I'm worn slap out with people getting completely bent out of the fucking frame at any mention of it. It doesn't matter that was posted in a "women's forum". It could have been posted in the men's forum or even the "sex and sexuality" forum. You can bet your left tit or testicle their STILL would have been someone rolling in with sirens blaring from the Purity Patrol, ready to issue a stink eye and a stern finger wagging about how "this has nothing to do with naturism". Yes, it does. In as much as genitalia is a part of the human body and sexuality a part of human experience it does. We know - we KNOW - that nudity does not equate to sex. How coukd we not know? There's someone screaming it at every turn, it seems. That still doesn't mran it isn't part if the equation. People always say "there are other places blah blah blah" whenever ANY discussion that even partially touches on sex is attempted. Guess what? I don't WANT to go to a porn site to have a legitimate adult discussion I should be able to have right here among adults. There IS a societal stigma against cut vs. uncut here in the US and ir IS a valid topic of discussion, and frankly women need to get the fick over it and stop actibg si goddamn indignant about shit. There is ao much sexism in the nudism community in terms of how it treats men to begin with. That whole "ermagherd! he's got an erection" business is such bullshit. Unless there is accomoanying suggestive behavior along with it, all you're doing is stigmatizing a body part and function. And save it with all that "not a part of nudism" crap when women can - and frequently do - post photos of themselves sitting with their ankles in separate time zones and their hands down at their pusses - sometimes even parting the lips - and no one says a goddamn thing. You're worn out on dick discussions? I'm worn out on the attempted excising of all things sexual from our nudist lives. It's only the exhausting crusades against it that piss me off enough to want to tell everyone: "Come look at my pee pee!"[/quote] Damn well said, wish I had come up with that myself ! You are so spot on with what you say. Specially those dear, darling women that spread like a man, but don't find it a problem when their vaginal innards are on full show like a Venus Fly Trap !!! A dick is a dick, a vagina is a vagina, each and every single one is different for whatever reason. Who actually gives a flying fuck ? Oh, the nudist police, those that feel it is their right to point out anyone else's supposed faults, but never take the time to look at their own. I call that being a two faced bitch (male or female). Men are born with a foreskin for a reason, it's easy to keep it clean, it does not cause or create VD. As for masturbation, the foreskin has as many nerve endings as the vaginal lips of any women. American men who are circumcised have to work so much harder to achieve orgasm that a guy with a foreskin. At the end of the day, it's all total bullshit.ReactReply - ROroffdusenMay 8, 2021
The point is no woman on here has given a ringing endorsement to the uncut penis. At best you get an "I don't care". Have you seen or heard of a woman actually preferring an uncut penis.
Am vexed at the women on here who prefer circumcised but won't say why.
Hope this helps.ReactReply - JOJohnMay 8, 2021
I think you're directing fire at the wrong target, em1dub. roffdusen is on your side. I certainly didn't get anything in his posts about "why mutilating little boys penises" is something he favors so strongly.
He was merely saying that most women don't use the status of a man's penis as a means of judging him. And I agree, and I think that most women today would not have their sons circumcised; they know better now.
What am I to think of a woman who had her breasts enlarged or reduced surgically? While she may no longer fit into a category of women I happen have a predilection for, I'd be a fool to use that as an excuse for not respecting her as a person. And if it's something she's chosen for herself, how much more ridiculous to judge someone on something that clearly hasn't been his choice, except for rare circumstances?
So when a person happens to like the look of a circumcised penis, it doesn't follow that the person supports genital mutilation and wants all penises to look like that. It's just another aspect of why some differences in looks are appealing and others are not.
ReactReply - ROroffdusenMay 11, 2021
As mentioned by Taganga, German women (who are exposed to way more foreskin) prefer his uncut Lt. Dingle. The whole thrust of this thread is about penis attractiveness. And that is what the focus should be solely about. If German women find an American penis more attractive, then end of discussion. A cut cock WINS in attractiveness.
In summary, an uncut cock can look like a cut cock (especially around women) without having to resort to surgery. Why you uncut guys are so resistant to peeling back Foreskin Freddie at the nude beach is beyond me. It only has to be a temporary adjustment.....and she will like it too.
Remember, we are discussing ATTRACTIVENESS on this thread.....nothing else.
Hope this clarifies any confusion.ReactReply - J.
J.May 11, 2021My parents were talked into having me circumcised when I was born. I wish I was uncut specifically for outdoor activities like going to a nude beach or lying by the pool at our local camp. Sunburn is a major concern when fully exposed and it happens far quicker than anywhere else. For a few days anything even lightly brushing it hurts, even just a towel wrap. I now know to use a lot of spray sunscreen between my legs when we are at the beach or pool, and I am pretty sure that the ladies find that more comical than attractive.
ReactReply - ROroffdusenMay 14, 2021[quote]roffdusen wrote: As mentioned by Taganga, German women (who are exposed to way more foreskin) prefer his uncut Lt. Dingle. The whole thrust of this thread is about penis attractiveness. And that is what the focus should be solely about. If German women find an American penis more attractive, then end of discussion. A cut cock WINS in attractiveness.In summary, an uncut cock can look like a cut cock (especially around women) without having to resort to surgery. Why you uncut guys are so resistant to peeling back Foreskin Freddie at the nude beach is beyond me. It only has to be a temporary adjustment.....and she will like it too.Remember, we are discussing ATTRACTIVENESS on this thread.....nothing else.Hope this clarifies any confusion. So men should pretend theyve had a blade taken to their mickeys?? Really because YOU have decided thats what women like? And foreskins stay back when flaccid?? Ill waste no more time here.[/quote] Sir, it is not only me. gentlecircumcision.com says 90 percent of women say cut is sexier. I can't paste it right now, but you can. Other stats from same site overwhelmingly in favor of CUT. I don't know how many times I have told you people you don't need surgery. Use your imagination. The stats for fellatio are even higher. Just ask any Jewish girl what she thinks of uncut. Look, put your political correctness in your back pocket and face reality; it's not a good look. Foreskin can be trained to stay back when flaccid. Put a collar behind the head so the foreskin stays back. You'll thank me. Oh, and she will too. Glad to help.ReactReply
- JOJohnMay 15, 2021roffdusenwrote: [quote]. gentlecircumcision.com says 90 percent of women say cut is sexier. I can't paste it right now, but you can. Other stats from same site overwhelmingly in favor of CUT.[/quote] Um, you can hardly expect a site like "gentlecircumcision.com " to endorse anything but circumcision. I wouldn't call that an impartial source. It's like a wine store saying that more people prefer wine to soft drinks. So I assume your remark was ironic. I do get what you're saying, though. As for me, if I were uncut, I wouldn't worry about it unless it actually came up in a conversation with a potential lover. And if women were turned off by it, I'd say that it's their problem, not mine.ReactReply
- GU
Guzzi27Jun 19, 2021[quote]Intact looks weird but it's better.....[/quote] So the natural unaltered state of something looks weird? Weird!ReactReply - RI
richardFeb 1, 2022I personally prefer cut. I think it's more attractive. Uncut even if natural can be quite ugly and some can't pull the foreskin over their mushroom head. To me that is the most sexy part of the penis.
ReactReply - AN
AnonFeb 2, 2022Great pictures of a beautiful object. Love it.
ReactReply - ROroffdusenFeb 3, 2022
It should be. Maybe it would raise standards at nude beach, which can be shockingly low.
ReactReply