I am asking all of you ladies this question!! How do you want your male partner to be? I'm asking this because, because I have been the long journey of restoring my natural look !!
Replies
- MI
MirandaApr 14, 2022[quote]I really dont care about your penis, the only person who seems to care about your penis is you. This is first and foremost a NUDIST side, and the fact that the first thing that comes up with nudity is "OOH THEY CAN SEE MY PEE PEE' and then the glorious tales are all about the genitals of course! Has it ever..I mean ever occured to you that the lack of women on this forum (or other forums for that matter) are the consequences of men jamming their penis questions in virtually every topic? Does it exite you, to talk about your penis? You get a kick out of it? Nudism isnt like this, it has nothing to do with genitals or even a focus on it. I might as well, start a forum about I should wear a ring on my left hand or my right hand? should I wear nailpolish too? what color? can I wear red nail polish when I'm nude? what you guys think? See how ridiculous you sound..Justwrap that penis into gift paper and send it to Guatamala, problems solved! Nina[/quote] Funny what is written. If it is indeed about nail polish, then I go for the color chestnut brown. So what is it about. And what does it really matter if you are naked, everyone looks slightly different and there is something to be said for both. But the thought of surprising me with gift wrapping paper seems fun to me. Miranda.ReactReply - LILittle_DavidSep 18, 2022
I'm not circumcised or want to be but I do retract my foreskin a lot of the time.
ReactReply - MR
Mr.HayesSep 28, 2022Im circumsized but am attempting to restore mine. Slow but seeing some results. Feels great
ReactReply - JO
JoeSep 29, 2022I was circed at 13, and regret it every day.
ReactReply - LILittle_DavidOct 8, 2022[quote]Im circumsized but am attempting to restore mine. Slow but seeing some results. Feels great[/quote] How are you going to manage that? Really puzzledReactReply
- MA
MarcusOct 16, 2022[quote]I really dont care about your penis, the only person who seems to care about your penis is you. This is first and foremost a NUDIST side, and the fact that the first thing that comes up with nudity is "OOH THEY CAN SEE MY PEE PEE' and then the glorious tales are all about the genitals of course! Has it ever..I mean ever occured to you that the lack of women on this forum (or other forums for that matter) are the consequences of men jamming their penis questions in virtually every topic? Does it exite you, to talk about your penis? You get a kick out of it? Nudism isnt like this, it has nothing to do with genitals or even a focus on it. I might as well, start a forum about I should wear a ring on my left hand or my right hand? should I wear nailpolish too? what color? can I wear red nail polish when I'm nude? what you guys think? See how ridiculous you sound..Justwrap that penis into gift paper and send it to Guatamala, problems solved! Nina[/quote] Great post, says it all.ReactReply - JO
Johno8175Jan 27, 2023[quote]Im circumcised and had a big hang up about for years its not very common here and Ive had partners that had never seen it but most said they preferred it[/quote]ReactReply - AL
AlanMar 20, 2023Mine is naturally left alone
ReactReply - BA
Baggieboy2112Mar 24, 2023I'm 'intact' so to speak but when I'm on a nude beach, I do like to roll my foreskin back to expose the head.
ReactReply - PR
PraSunMay 12, 2023Hinduism is a 20000 year old established way of life, and they leave the foreskin on despite plastic surgery being invented by them centuries ago. So, its not ignorance.
ReactReply - RIRichardJun 29, 2023
God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness..............
God has a foreskin, good enough for him good enough for me.ReactReply - JO
JohnJul 3, 2023[quote]God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.............. God has a foreskin, good enough for him good enough for me.[/quote] I personally suspect that it's the other way around, and that we made God (or gods) in our image. I also personally believe that from a naturist point of view, it doesn't make a shred of difference whether a person is circumcised or not. Almost always, it's not a choice that a man makes for himself. If a person lost a finger or a toe or a hand due to an accident, or a breast due to cancer, we wouldn't exclude them from our company, we'd just say that life has happened to that person and then move on.ReactReply - ST
StevieLornaJul 3, 2023So many guys obsessing over such a little thing.
And Im not talking about the skin or lack of it.
ReactReply - TO
TonyJul 21, 2023Just a reminder. Circumcism is not "mutilation." It is a legitimate medical procedure and is in medical books in the "surgery" section.
ReactReply - MEMemberJul 25, 2023
My wife (a surgeon) has begrudgingly done many of them. The most common justification - other than for faiths that still believe it's necessary - is that "his dad has one and we don't want them to look different" or something similar. So often she's been tempted to say "Do you plan to compare often?" and "If your husband was missing a finger or an ear for some reason, would that make a difference? We can function just fine with 9 fingers or one ear..."
Yes, it's a medical procedure but there's little evidence that in MOST cases it's a NECESSARY one. (My brother had it done at age 10 for purely medical reasons - he had some scarring that caused problems. And before anyone says "See? Wouldn't have been a problem." he also had appendicitis but I don't hear anyone talking of removing an appendix prematurely.ReactReply - NI
NicenudistmaleAug 8, 2023Great Words, i see that the same way.
As a men who are not circumcised i can say it is totally ok and no Problem cause i never had a Girl who complained about that .ReactReply - NONot-so-shySep 9, 2023
I am intact, and I nevertheless take the liberty to feed back some reactions from a former lover who had never experienced other than circumcized men before. The girl-friend as well as her own sister were very open to this kind of discussion, and this is what they both reported. The oral sex is better after circumcision, because "there is not all that skin" (in the mouth). The copulation is when the intact get's the advantage, because the extra skin (of the prepuce) acts as a "smooth roller on a conveyor belt". This former lover had worked in manufacturing, and her limited blue-collar vocabulary was directly explaining in her own way, that the prepuce was preventing the uncomfortable rubbing of the penis while penetrating and reversing from the inside of the vagina. In other word, an intact penis is much more pleasurable during a traditional copulation. This former-lover incidentally was amazed at the sex we had, since it was the normal penis-vaginal copulation. It was not the case for when she demanded to be sodomized, because my own intact penis was not as penetrative during anal sex. The usage of a condom became a must for this kind of kinky sex, rendering my penis as a rigid dildo. This explains later when I knew of gay men who had circumcized at an adult age for the sole purpose of oral sex & anal sex convenience.
Personally, although I am more on the part of been a reserved man, who has been chaste for awhile and who has had very few lovers, I can testify that all the women told me that 'intact' gives the best (vaginal) sex, the kind of sex which makes the lady to demand at having a baby.
ReactReply - SH
SherylSep 10, 2023I don't see what this has to do with nudism.
ReactReply - DEDebiuk1970Jan 13, 2024
Not into any genital mutlilation! I prefer natural uncircumasized cocks.
ReactReply - HA
HawkJan 13, 2024[quote]I don't see what this has to do with nudism.[/quote] Agreed . . .ReactReply - NA
naturist_py9953May 14, 2024I think a lot has to do with where they are from and what they are used to seeing
ReactReply - NAnaturist_py9953May 14, 2024
I got circucised as an adult after getting married because my wife requested it.
ReactReply - CU
cut-greekSep 4, 2025[quote]Not into any genital mutlilation! I prefer natural uncircumasized cocks.[/quote] Sorry to interject given I'm not the sex being asked but: a) I doubt you believe it's mutilation, that would mean that modern medicine facilitates the mutilaion of 1/4-1/3 of the world's men while the lights were off, propably just venting your bad day in a way that you don't realize is cruel to others b) if you do indeed believe it, then I assume you also call people in wheelchairs cripples to their face. What kind of person does that make you I wonder?ReactReply - OS
OsoSep 24, 2025[/quote] Sorry to interject given I'm not the sex being asked but: a) I doubt you believe it's mutilation, that would mean that modern medicine facilitates the mutilaion of 1/4-1/3 of the world's men while the lights were off, propably just venting your bad day in a way that you don't realize is cruel to others b) if you do indeed believe it, then I assume you also call people in wheelchairs cripples to their face. What kind of person does that make you I wonder?[/quote] They literally perform an irreversible procedure where they cut off the most nerve laden part of a newborn males body(which can have double the amount of nerve endings compared to a clitoris for reference), while he is just days old, without any kind of consent, at best they use a topical numbing cream or local anesthetic. The swelling can be so intense it ruptures the sutures, which actually happened to a friends newborn. They had to rush him to the ER to have emergency surgery on their 4 day old baby to cauterize his surgical incision to stop the bleeding. Watch a video of a newborn boy being circumcised and tell me that isn't barbaric and it most certainly is mutilation. When a similar procedure is done to newborn females it is literally classified as genital mutilation, but its just accepted by society when its baby boys. In 2014 the very first successful penile transplant took place on a then 21 year old male. His reason for needing the surgery? a botched circumcision. In a time when soap and water are readily available, there is practically zero reason to mutilate a newborn baby boy. In extreme cases of phimosis it is necessary, otherwise its done for cosmetic or religious reasons. Not for any kind of benefit to the child.ReactReply