Inappropriate photos — Website Upgrades and Opinions on True Nudists

Cheri Donna DawsonOriginal Poster

Mar 26, 2010

Yes, erection photos are not appropriate here. Female spread eagle shots are as bad such as the ones Pearl athttp://www.truenudists.com/profiles/index.php?id=655just uploaded and has one as her profile.

ReactReplySubscribe

Replies

CD
Cheri Donna DawsonOriginal Poster
Mar 27, 2010
[quote]This guy uploaded inappropriate pics as well (erections): http://www.truenudists.com/profiles/19093/ Flagged![/quote] He's not got them now.
ReactReply
CD
Cheri Donna DawsonOriginal Poster
Mar 28, 2010
NudistSpain uploaded some inappropriate photos IMHO. He's no longer on my friend list.
ReactReply
ER
Eric
Aug 30, 2010
[quote]Yes, erection photos are not appropriate here. Female spread eagle shots are as bad such as the ones Pearl athttp://www.truenudists.com/profiles/index.php?id=655just uploaded and has one as her profile.[/quote] I know this is an old post, but what's the deal with Pearl? I guess she adds everyone that joins daily because I got a friend request from her on my first day and, of course, I had never met her. I got some link from her promoting some website where she sells her own videos or something....
ReactReply
CD
Cheri Donna DawsonOriginal Poster
Sep 3, 2010
[quote]This ones been in the gallery since day dot !!!!! , presumably added by teamtrue !!!!http://www.truenudists.com/gallery/index2.php?group=4&order=1[/quote] You need to post the url of the profile rather than the url of the photo. all this does is get that photo to be more viewed.
ReactReply
GE
Gerry-4
Sep 3, 2010
[quote][quote]This ones been in the gallery since day dot !!!!! , presumably added by teamtrue !!!!http://www.truenudists.com/gallery/index2.php?group=4&order=1[/quote] You need to post the url of the profile rather than the url of the photo. all this does is get that photo to be more viewed.[/quote] Actually, Cheri, TT1 himself put that there, presumably a long time ago since it's been there ever since I've joined. This means we're going to have to flag TT1. Ironic, isn't it?
ReactReply
PH
Philfreeeuk
Sep 3, 2010
[quote][quote][quote]This ones been in the gallery since day dot !!!!! , presumably added by teamtrue !!!!http://www.truenudists.com/gallery/index2.php?group=4&order=1[/quote] You need to post the url of the profile rather than the url of the photo. all this does is get that photo to be more viewed.[/quote] Actually, Cheri, TT1 himself put that there, presumably a long time ago since it's been there ever since I've joined. This means we're going to have to flag TT1. Ironic, isn't it?[/quote] I DARE YA!
ReactReply
GE
Gerry-4
Sep 6, 2010
I'm not THAT crazy!
ReactReply
GE
Gerry-4
Sep 6, 2010
What do you think, Cheri? Shall we?
ReactReply
CD
Cheri Donna DawsonOriginal Poster
Sep 6, 2010
http://www.truenudists.com/profiles/photos.php?id=69444
totally inappropriate
ReactReply
CD
Cheri Donna DawsonOriginal Poster
Sep 6, 2010
[quote]What do you think, Cheri? Shall we?[/quote] I've flagged the user name of that photo, not TT1. When I lost my clothes I didn't lose my common sense. :)
ReactReply
PH
Philfreeeuk
Sep 6, 2010
[quote]http://www.truenudists.com/profiles/photos.php?id=69444 totally inappropriate[/quote] Thanks Cheri :)DebbieDDnCOhttp://www.truenudists.com/profiles/69444/------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reason: Inappropriate pics.http://www.truenudists.com/profiles/photos.php?id=69444------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Please copy the above message to your mouse, and if you agree, hit the link to the creators profile, hit the "Flag Me" button and paste into the flag report field. Hit "Flag this user" and you're done!ThanksPhil. EDIT:(((((((((((((((((((((((((((( No Profile Found for this username )))))))))))))))))))))))))))
ReactReply
GE
Gerry-4
Sep 7, 2010
The member may be gone, but the picture can still be found in the Gallery. Check it out for yourself!http://www.truenudists.com/gallery/index2.php?group=4&order=1So, what's plan B?
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Sep 7, 2010
Leave it up to the moderators to break the bad news? Post a 'letter' we can all send to abuse@ or give things another few days to settle down? The profile has gone perhaps the truenudist pixies will remove the photo too!
ReactReply
MI
MisterD
Sep 12, 2010
[quote][quote][quote]This ones been in the gallery since day dot !!!!! , presumably added by teamtrue !!!!http://www.truenudists.com/gallery/index2.php?group=4&order=1[/quote] You need to post the url of the profile rather than the url of the photo. all this does is get that photo to be more viewed.[/quote] Actually, Cheri, TT1 himself put that there, presumably a long time ago since it's been there ever since I've joined. This means we're going to have to flag TT1. Ironic, isn't it?[/quote] Our question would be if the definition of erect is being implied as only a penis that is fully standing? If so, then there are many photos that are obscene in nature that would be allowed here as there are men who are so big that they would pass-out with a lack of blood if they were able to get an erection that raised higher than parallel with the ground while standing. We also would like to know what spread eagled is defined as. We ask because we do not consider that a woman who straddles a chair while sitting if not drawing direct attention to her vagina as being obscene. She is simply sitting in a natural position. Now a woman laying on a bed with her knees up and being pulled to the side or back in a manner to fully and intentionally expose her vagina as being obscene because it is not a natural pose. Some women will lay with their legs spread to avoid tan lines. Is that obscene or natural? Having pubic hair is natural so we tend to view folks who fully shave their pubic region as displaying themselves in an unnatural state or being obscene. We see lots of photos that fall into that category. Are they obscene?
ReactReply
AA
Akis a.r.t.
Sep 13, 2010
sorry for interrupting, after all i have not such photos on my profile.. :)
But you talk about inappropriate photos.. What about inappropriate behavior? What about girls for example who join this website as naturists, but actually they run personal pages with their webcams, trying to find clients here to see them naked for money? I deleted many already from my friends'list.. And also, what about people who just add you there, as a friend and they never communicate with you after that? Is this the right way to join a website?
Personally, i would prefer this guy with half erected penis to be my friend and contacting with me, than any girl or guy with "appropriate" photos (Jesus, we are in a website full of naked people after all! ;)) who never give a sign to me...
With all due respect (and forgive me about poor English..)
ReactReply
ME
Member
Sep 13, 2010
[quote]sorry for interrupting, after all i have not such photos on my profile.. :) But you talk about inappropriate photos.. What about inappropriate behavior? What about girls for example who join this website as naturists, but actually they run personal pages with their webcams, trying to find clients here to see them naked for money? I deleted many already from my friends'list.. And also, what about people who just add you there, as a friend and they never communicate with you after that? Is this the right way to join a website? Personally, i would prefer this guy with half erected penis to be my friend and contacting with me, than any girl or guy with "appropriate" photos (Jesus, we are in a website full of naked people after all! ;)) who never give a sign to me... With all due respect (and forgive me about poor English..)[/quote] Thus the photo guidelines here appears to mean that half a erection is not a erection, and that half spread eagle (or natural spread eagle) is not considered spread eagle. Seeing that as demonstrated by TT1's examples we can better stick to TT1's interpretation of the photo guidelines and get back to flagging what is spread eagle or erect by TT1's standards and examples. This should eliminate half the flaggings that have been wasted because of over kill.
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Sep 13, 2010
An errection is a penis in anything other than the flaccid state, easy.
ReactReply
MI
MisterD
Sep 14, 2010
[quote]An errection is a penis in anything other than the flaccid state, easy.[/quote] LOL Then there are many photos here that should be flagged, to include the one being discussed earlierhttp://www.truenudists.com/gallery/index2.php?group=4&order=1that was posted by TeamTrue1.
ReactReply
ME
Member
Sep 23, 2010
I'm a happily married, heterosexual man yet I still get friends requests from openly gay men looking for 'friendship' (A) I use this site to chat with like minded nudists / naturists. (B) I have more than enough friends in the real world - I don't need cyber 'friends'. So, can people likehttp://www.truenudists.com/profiles/index.php?id=47034please leave me alone. stick your fingers up your own bum !
ReactReply
WO
Wolf
Sep 23, 2010
Ok, really...has it come to this? Can't believe this profile photo got approved with the website logo in it.http://www.truenudists.com/profiles/photos.php?id=64935
ReactReply
CD
Cheri Donna DawsonOriginal Poster
May 16, 2011
http://www.truenudists.com/profiles/photos.php?id=64935
ReactReply
WE
westheathen
May 16, 2011
[quote]This ones been in the gallery since day dot !!!!! , presumably added by teamtrue !!!!http://www.truenudists.com/gallery/index2.php?group=4&order=1[/quote]I responded to a comment somewhere on the forum about this photo during the weekend.I am not sure where the post was or who it was by, but I am sure I have read that originally the "gallery" was open for any member to add photos as they wanted; so it may not be TT1 that added it. But you are correct it certainly looks like an erection to me an therefore should not be there.
ReactReply