Capital Shooting, Oct. 3 — Anything Else on True Nudists

DanandJanetteOriginal Poster

Oct 3, 2013

Still confused about the details. Supposedly this woman rammed a barricade, but pictures of her car afterwards show a front end in pristine condition. Did she ram it in reverse?

ReactReplySubscribe

Replies

T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 7, 2013
No repeat offenders. Saves time, effort and money.
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Oct 8, 2013
[quote]No repeat offenders. Saves time, effort and money.[/quote]Yup, shoot to kill, First - Less questions later and certainly none from the grave.
ReactReply
DE
DesertRat
Oct 8, 2013
In the interest of protecting the child's rights, someone will file a wrongful death suit in behalf of the child. The government, meaning us taxpayers, will end up being stuck with an enormous bill. The police shooters will not have to pay a dime. That's how government works and it stinks.
ReactReply
T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 9, 2013
"The police shooters" are not tax payers?

ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Oct 9, 2013
[quote]In the interest of protecting the child's rights, someone will file a wrongful death suit in behalf of the child. The government, meaning us taxpayers, will end up being stuck with an enormous bill. The police shooters will not have to pay a dime. That's how government works and it stinks.[/quote]What stinks is the shooting of an unarmed woman.
ReactReply
T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 9, 2013
[quote][quote]In the interest of protecting the child's rights, someone will file a wrongful death suit in behalf of the child. The government, meaning us taxpayers, will end up being stuck with an enormous bill. The police shooters will not have to pay a dime. That's how government works and it stinks.[/quote]What stinks is the shooting of an unarmed woman.[/quote]An aggressive woman was driving an Infiniti automobile witha curb weight of 2,535 to 2,818 lb. (1,150 to 1,278 kg.)
that is a pretty good sizedweapon.
ReactReply
ME
Member
Oct 9, 2013
[quote][quote]In the interest of protecting the child's rights, someone will file a wrongful death suit in behalf of the child. The government, meaning us taxpayers, will end up being stuck with an enormous bill. The police shooters will not have to pay a dime. That's how government works and it stinks.[/quote]What stinks is the shooting of an unarmed woman.[/quote]She defied police orders, hit I believe two officers, and tore down the street to the Capitol at 80 mph.Anyone who has walked the Mall knows that those streets are not conducive to high speeds. She was armed with a deadly weapon, and she fired it more than once. The whole thing is a tragedy. Like the shootings in Aurora, Newtown, Arizona, Virginia Tech and others, the problem appears to be a failure of the mental health laws.
ReactReply
T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 9, 2013
Miriam Carey, the 34 year old woman of Stamford, CNwas notarmed with a firearm.She used her car as a deadly weapon.

ReactReply
SO
Soupie
Oct 9, 2013
True, though Brucie would like to insinuate otherwise. Her car was blocked in and incapable of moving when she was shot dead. Ever heard of a taser?
ReactReply
ME
Member
Oct 9, 2013
[quote]Miriam Carey, the 34 year old woman of Stamford, CNwas notarmed with a firearm.She used her car as a deadly weapon.

[/quote]Thomas,
I did not say that she used a firearm. I said she was armed with a deadly weapon, and she fired it more than once. She struck, I believe two officers and tore through the streets at 80 mph. The point is she used deadly force, after those around her knew of her mental illness. The same is true of the shooters in Aurora, Arizona, Virginia Tech, Newtown and elsewhere. The problem is that liberals have destroyed the mental health system in this country-preferring to let the mentally ill suffer so that they can be free. So they may have their rights unobstructed beyond the point of being a danger to themselves and to others. Yet those same liberals want to keep mentally stable, law abiding black people who live in the inner city; unarmed in their own homes so that they may be preyed upon by the criminal elements of society.
ReactReply
T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 9, 2013
Sorry! I was confused. I never "fired" an automobile.

I have only "fired" firearms.
ReactReply
SO
Soupie
Oct 9, 2013
How disingenuous. Find out how much republicans are in support of increasing funding for research and treatment in mental health. No, just blame liberals and Obama for everything. That's easier than actually proposing a solution. The right wing would be all over it if the government denied civil rights by making it easier to have people committed. Once again, Brucie hijacks a thread about police shootings to make it his own personal platform for his wacky political "theories".
ReactReply
T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 9, 2013
Republicans "increasing funding for research and treatment in mental health"? Never, cure mental health problems and there would be no Republican Party.
ReactReply
MA
ManOfWicklow
Oct 10, 2013
If they had auto bollards like these that pop up from the ground, the vehicle would have been stopped instantly. No need for guns, as you can see from the picture below,they will even stop a truck.

[img src="http://www.aptcontrols.co.uk/images/products/security-systems/bollards/boltdown.jpg">
ReactReply
T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 10, 2013
Yeah, "If".
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Oct 10, 2013
[quote]True, though Brucie would like to insinuate otherwise. Her car was blocked in and incapable of moving when she was shot dead. Ever heard of a taser?[/quote]Correct!
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Oct 10, 2013
[quote]Miriam Carey, the 34 year old woman of Stamford, CNwas notarmed with a firearm.She used her car as a deadly weapon.

[/quote]Does that mean we all need a 'permit to carry' with our drivers licence?
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Oct 10, 2013
This whole thing seems ludicrous to you too? A lady does something while driving her car, panics! Tries to drive away, she is no getaway driver and is caught and shot! - Wrong place wrong time? Yes.
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Oct 12, 2013
Bullets are cheaper than barriers.
ReactReply
MA
ManOfWicklow
Oct 12, 2013
Saving money has always taken priority over saving lives,with ALL governments. And always will be.
ReactReply
SO
Soupie
Oct 13, 2013
Well, you really have no clue what a "true communist" is, do you? You have a four year old's conception from 1950. Being in favour of sensible gun control has nothing to do with communism. You were probably thinking of fascism, but you don't know what that is either.
ReactReply
DE
DesertRat
Oct 13, 2013
[quote]

Well, you really have no clue what a "true communist" is, do you? You have a four year old's conception from 1950. Being in favour of sensible gun control has nothing to do with communism. You were probably thinking of fascism, but you don't know what that is either.[/quote]Please explain the meaning of the terms Fascism and Communism. People confuse and misuse them all the time.
ReactReply
RE
renebbare
Oct 13, 2013
I'm not for communism or fascism and am certainly not for shooting the unarmed.
I have to say I am not opposed to guns or sensible gun control.
ReactReply
T=
Tom === Thomas S. Tierney
Oct 14, 2013
Who shall control the guns?
ReactReply